Have Policies Tackled Gender Inequalities in Health? A Scoping Review

Author:

Crespí-Lloréns Nuria,Hernández-Aguado IldefonsoORCID,Chilet-Rosell Elisa

Abstract

Gender is recognized as one of the most relevant determinants of health inequalities. This scoping review sought to identify and analyse policies, either implemented or formulated as proposals, which aimed to reduce gender inequalities in health. We searched Medline, Web of Science, and Scielo. Of 2895 records, 91 full text articles were analysed, and 33 papers were included. Of these papers, 22 described the process of formulation, implementation, or evaluation of policies whose aim was to reduce gender inequalities in health; six focused on recommendations, and the remaining five dealt with both issues. Our review showed that the policies aimed at reducing gender inequalities in health, either implemented or formulated as proposals, are scarce. Moreover, despite some success, overall progress has been slow. The studies show failures in design and particularly in the implementation process. We found a lack of awareness and capacity in the policy-making progress, under-financing, bureaucratization, shortage of relevant data, and absence of women’s participation in decision-making. Therefore, an emphasis on the design and implementation of gender-sensitive policies seems essential to advance gender equality in health. This scoping review gathers evidence to support the design of such policies and recommendations that can facilitate their implementation.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference56 articles.

1. Gender equality in science, medicine, and global health: where are we at and why does it matter?

2. How serious are global health leaders about gender equality?

3. Sixtieth World Health Assembly, Geneva, 14–23 May 2007: Summary Records of Committees: Reports of Committees. World Health Organizationhttps://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/22640

4. Beijing Fifteen Years On: The Persistence of Barriers to Gender Mainstreaming in Health Policy

5. Report of the Fourth World Conference on Women (Beijing, 4–15 September 1995). United Nations, and Platform for Action Plan 2000. UNhttps://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/pdf/Beijing%20full%20report%20E.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3