Abstract
Communication failures were a leading cause of sentinel events in the operation room due to frequently the communication breakdown occurs between physicians and nurses. This study explored the perspectives of surgical teams (nurses, physicians, and anaesthesiologists) on interprofessional collaboration and improvement strategies. A surgical team comprising eight perioperative nurses, four surgeons, and four anaesthesiologists from a university-affiliated hospital participated in this qualitative and phenomenological research from December 2018 to April 2019. Data were collected in in-depth interviews and were used in a thematic analysis according to Colaizzi to extract themes and categorised codes with the ATLAS.ti software. The result is presented in three generic categories: Barrier-like disruptive behaviours and lack of coordination of care; consequences by safety threats to the patient; overcoming barriers by shared decision making among professionals, flattened hierarchies, and teamwork/communication training. The conclusion is that different teams’ perspectives can facilitate genuine reflection, discussion, and implementation of targeted interventions to improve operating room interprofessional collaboration and overcome barriers and their consequences. Currently, there is a need to change towards interprofessional collaboration for optimal patient outcomes and to ensure all professionals’ expectations are met.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference40 articles.
1. The incidence, root-causes, and outcomes of adverse events in surgical units: implication for potential prevention strategies
2. Physicians’ and nurses’ medical errors associated with communication failures;Topcu;JPMA. J. Pak. Med Assoc.,2017
3. Measuring the Impact of Interprofessional Education on Collaborative Practice and Patient Outcomes,2015
4. Transition between Inpatient Hospital Settings and Community or Care Home Settings for Adults with Social Care Needs,2015
5. Examining semantics in interprofessional research: A bibliometric study
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献