Abstract
Training based on clinical simulation is an effective method of teaching in nursing. Nevertheless, there is no clear evidence about if it is better to use high- or medium-fidelity simulation. The aim is to analyse if students are more satisfied when their clinical simulation practices are based on high-fidelity simulation (HFS) or medium-fidelity simulation (MFS). Students´ satisfaction was assessed using the Satisfaction Scale Questionnaire with High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation. The sample is composed of 393 students from two Spanish Universities. Satisfaction with simulation in nursing students is significantly greater in MFS than HFS. Simulation is beneficial for learning in all its forms, but for the acquisition of basic skills, and at a lower cost, MFS proves to be effective. However, high-fidelity is not always better than medium-fidelity as this depends on the student’s level of knowledge and clinical experience.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference46 articles.
1. Support Guide for the Writing, Implementation and Evaluation of Learning Outcomes Version 1.0http://www.aneca.es/Sala-de-prensa/Noticias/2013/ANECA-presenta-la-Guia-para-la-redaccion-y-evaluacion-de-los-resultados-del-aprendizaje
2. ORDEN CIN/2134/2008, 3 July. Ministry of Science and Innovation. Spainhttps://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2008-12388
3. Self-assessed level of competence of graduating nursing students and factors related to it
4. Knowledge and competence with patient safety as perceived by nursing students: The findings of a cross-sectional study
5. Learning strategies used by undergraduate nursing students in the context of a digitial educational strategy based on script concordance: A descriptive study
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献