Harmonization of Newborn Screening Results for Pompe Disease and Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I

Author:

Dorley M. Christine12ORCID,Dizikes George J.3ORCID,Pickens Charles Austin4ORCID,Cuthbert Carla4,Basheeruddin Khaja5,Gulamali-Majid Fizza6,Hetterich Paul7,Hietala Amy8,Kelsey Ashley9,Klug Tracy10,Lesko Barbara11,Mills Michelle12,Moloney Shawn9,Neogi Partha13,Orsini Joseph14,Singer Douglas15,Petritis Konstantinos4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Tennessee Department of Health, Division of Laboratory Services, Nashville, TN 37243, USA

2. College of Health Sciences & Public Policy, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN 55401, USA

3. Tennessee Department of Health, Division of Laboratory Services, Knoxville, TN 37920, USA

4. Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA

5. Illinois Department of Public Health, Chicago, IL 60612, USA

6. Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

7. Virginia Department of General Services, Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services, Richmond, VA 23219, USA

8. Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN 55155, USA

9. Michigan Department of Health & Human Services, Lansing, MI 48906, USA

10. Missouri State Public Health Laboratory, Jefferson City, MO 65101, USA

11. Department of Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA

12. Kansas Health and Environmental Laboratories, Topeka, KS 66620, USA

13. California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA

14. Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208, USA

15. Ohio Department of Health, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068, USA

Abstract

In newborn screening, false-negative results can be disastrous, leading to disability and death, while false-positive results contribute to parental anxiety and unnecessary follow-ups. Cutoffs are set conservatively to prevent missed cases for Pompe and MPS I, resulting in increased falsepositive results and lower positive predictive values. Harmonization has been proposed as a way to minimize false-negative and false-positive results and correct for method differences, so we harmonized enzyme activities for Pompe and MPS I across laboratories and testing methods (Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) or Digital Microfluidics (DMF)). Participating states analyzed proofof- concept calibrators, blanks, and contrived specimens and reported enzyme activities, cutoffs, and other testing parameters to Tennessee. Regression and multiples of the median were used to harmonize the data. We observed varied cutoffs and results. Six of seven MS/MS labs reported enzyme activities for one specimen for MPS I marginally above their respective cutoffs with results classified as negative, whereas all DMF labs reported this specimen’s enzyme activity below their respective cutoffs with results classified as positive. Reasonable agreement in enzyme activities and cutoffs was achieved with harmonization; however, harmonization does not change how a value would be reported as this is dependent on the placement of cutoffs.

Funder

CDC collaborative agreement

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous),Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference46 articles.

1. Mandatory newborn screening in the United States: History, current status, and existential challenges;McCandless;Birth Defects Res.,2020

2. (2021, February 24). Newborn Screening Timeliness Goals, Available online: https://www.hrsa.gov/advisory-committees/heritable-disorders/newborn-screening-timeliness.html.

3. Gabler, E. (2016). Lab’s Standards Missed Baby’s Serious Disorder: Uniformity Lacking in States’ Screenings. J. Sentin., Available online: https://projects.jsonline.com/news/2016/12/29/uniformity-lacking-for-newborn-screening.html.

4. Gabler, E. (2017). Federal Committee to Study Lack of Uniformity in Newborn Testing. J. Sentin., Available online: https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/investigations/2017/02/10/federal-committee-study-lack-uniformity-newborn-testing/97703280/.

5. (2020, April 05). Recommended Uniform Screening Panel, Available online: https://www.hrsa.gov/advisory-committees/heritable-disorders/rusp/index.html.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3