Effect of Mobilization with Movement on Pain, Disability, and Range of Motion in Patients with Shoulder Pain and Movement Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Dias Daniela123,Neto Mansueto Gomes123ORCID,Sales Stephane da Silva Ribeiro3,Cavalcante Bárbara dos Santos3,Torrierri Palmiro3,Roever Leonardo45ORCID,Araújo Roberto Paulo Correia de26

Affiliation:

1. Physiotherapy Department, Multidisciplinary Institute of Rehabilitation and Health, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador 40110-170, Brazil

2. Postgraduate Program in Interactive Processes of Organs and Systems, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador 40170-110, Brazil

3. Physiotherapy Research Group, Physiotherapy Department, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador 40210-905, Brazil

4. Department of Clinical Research, Brazilian Evidence-Based Health Network, Uberlândia 38408-100, Brazil

5. Gilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Beirut 1401, Lebanon

6. Biochemistry Department, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador 40170-110, Brazil

Abstract

Background: Shoulder pain is a disabling musculoskeletal disorder worldwide. Thus, it is important to identify interventions able to improve pain and disability. Objective: To investigate the effects of mobilization with movement (MWM) on pain, disability, and range of motion in patients with shoulder pain and movement impairment. Methods: A systematic search of different databases was performed. The systematic review protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023404128). A random-effects model for meta-analysis was used to determine the mean difference (MD), standardized mean differences (SMD), and 95% confidence interval for the outcome of interest. Results: Twenty-six studies were included. Of these, eighteen were included in the meta-analysis. MWM improved pain during movement with a moderate effect SMD of (−0.6; 95% confidence interval, −1.1 to −0.1, I2 = 0%; N = 66;) and shoulder abduction MD of (12.7°; 1.3 to 24.0; I2 = 73%; N = 90) compared to sham MWM in the short term (0–6 weeks). Combined MWM and conventional rehabilitation improved pain at rest, with a MD of (−1.2; −2.2 to −0.2; I2 = 61%; N = 100), and disability SMD of (−1.3; confidence interval −2.2 to −0.4; I2 = 87%; N = 185) compared to conventional rehabilitation alone in the short term. Combined MWM and conventional rehabilitation also resulted in improvement in shoulder abduction and external rotation. Compared to Maitland, MWM resulted in improvement in the shoulder abduction MD (20.4°; confidence interval 4.3 to 36.5; I2 = 89%; N = 130) in the short term. There is no information regarding long-term effects. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that MWM may reduce shoulder pain and restore shoulder range of motion and function. Our findings are promising, but the evidence is not strong enough to recommend it pragmatically.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3