Affiliation:
1. Department of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the pressure characteristics of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt, a microinvasive glaucoma device, using an in vitro setup. Additionally, the study explores the impact of the scleral tissue surrounding the device on its pressure and lumen area. Ten PRESERFLO MicroShunts were subjected to an in vitro experimental setup. A constant flow of physiological saline was maintained at 2 μL/min using an infusion syringe pump. The PRESERFLO was connected to a pressure transducer via a 23 G needle. Pressure characteristics were measured under three different conditions: without sclera [sclera (-)], passing through sclera at a 90° angle (sclera 90°), and passing through sclera at a 30° angle (sclera 30°). The lumen area of the device was measured using microscopic observation. We observed peak and trough pressures in this experimental setting; the peak pressure (6.76 mmHg) was significantly higher than the trough pressure of 4.74 mmHg (p = 0.0020) in the sclera (-) condition. Compared to sclera (-), the peak pressures were significantly higher in the sclera 90° (7.81 mmHg, p = 0.0020) and the sclera 30° (7.96 mmHg, p = 0.0039) conditions. Additionally, compared to sclera (-), the trough pressure was significantly higher in the sclera 90° (6.25 mmHg, p = 0.0039) and the sclera 30° (5.76 mmHg, p = 0.037) conditions. The lumen area was significantly smaller in the sclera 90° condition (3515 μm2) than the sclera (-) condition (3927 μm2, p = 0.0078). The study found that when the distal end of PRESERFLO MicroShunt was free and in air, it exhibited both peak and trough pressures. The presence of scleral tissue surrounding the PRESERFLO MicroShunt affects its lumen area and pressure characteristics. Understanding these effects can provide valuable insights into the device’s performance.
Funder
Saiichi Mishima Memorial Ophthalmic Research
Reference21 articles.
1. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: A review;Weinreb;JAMA,2014
2. Glaucoma treatment;Bluwol;Rev. Prat.,2016
3. Conventional glaucoma implants and the new MIGS devices: A comprehensive review of current options and future directions;Pereira;Eye,2021
4. Rowson, A.C., Hogarty, D.T., Maher, D., and Liu, L. (2022). Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Safety of Individual Devices. J. Clin. Med., 11.
5. Minimally Invasive Surgery in Mild-to-Moderate Glaucoma Patients in Italy: Is It Time to Change?;Costagliola;Clin. Ophthalmol.,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献