Abstract
This paper analyses the concept of vulnerability as it is applied to university students, and also staff, to assess the extent to which it has become a new norm that transforms the understanding of the individual—from being more robust, towards a more fragile sense of personhood. We examine the changing use of the term ‘vulnerable’ over time and with reference to the institutionalisation of the ‘vulnerable subject’. The paper relates this to the theoretical discussion about postmodernism and the ‘end of truth’ within academia, with the subsequent emergence of safe spaces as a mechanism for protecting the vulnerable student. Using snowball sampling, a pilot ethnographic study of academics who have experienced, or claim to have experienced, limits on their academic freedom is developed. One conclusion is that limits to academic freedom stem from within the academy itself. This conclusion is related to the growing understanding that student ‘wellbeing’ necessitates the regulation and ‘policing’ of knowledge and ideas that are deemed to be offensive to the vulnerable student.
Reference52 articles.
1. ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE DIMINISHED SUBJECT
2. The politics of academic freedom
3. Hate: Why We Should Resist It with Free Speech, Not Censorship;Strossen,2018
4. The Times Newspaperhttps://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/keep-exposing-young-to-ideas-that-provoke-gavin-williamson-tells-universities-tsdwjfh80?fbclid=IwAR1oJ94LnQgHQKr2a6P0uRH8bBijPhKgrus1hz7PSRALPV9MNFAXQ1ccH2I
5. Academic Freedom in Our Universities: The Best and the Worsthttps://www.civitas.org.uk/content/files/Academic-Freedom-in-Our-Universities.pdf
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献