Patient and Provider Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to the Acceptance of Pain Neuroscience Education in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions: A Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol

Author:

Kühn Lukas123,Reiter Nils Lennart45,Wengemuth Eileen1,Choi Kyung-Eun (Anna)136ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Seebad 82/83, 15562 Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany

2. Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Fehrbelliner Straße 38, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany

3. Evidence Based Practice in Brandenburg—A JBI Affiliated Group, Hochstraße 29, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany

4. Institute of Applied Sciences (IFAF), Alice Salomon University of Applied Sciences, Alice-Salomon Platz 5, 12627 Berlin, Germany

5. PhysioBib GbR, Johanniterstraße 26, 10961 Berlin, Germany

6. Health Services Research, Research Center MIAAI (Medical Image Analysis & Artificial Intelligence), Faculty of Medicine/Dentistry, Danube Private University, Steiner Landstraße 124, 3500 Krems-Stein, Austria

Abstract

Objective: To identify and map barriers and facilitators to the acceptance of pain neuroscience education for chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions. Introduction: Pain neuroscience education aims to reconceptualize the understanding of the biology of pain. This includes the acknowledgment of physiological and psychological processes relevant to pain experiences to ultimately change maladaptive beliefs and behaviors. Pain neuroscience education in chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions has been demonstrated to positively influence relevant treatment outcomes. Inclusion criteria: Only qualitative studies will be included. The population will include patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and healthcare providers involved in pain management. The phenomenon of interest encompasses educational interventions on the biology and psychology of pain, which aim to reconceptualize patients’ understanding of pain. Methods: A comprehensive search strategy will be conducted on MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, PsycInfo, and CINHAL. Two reviewers will independently conduct the study selection process, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis. Discrepancies will be resolved by a third reviewer. The assessment of methodological quality will be guided by JBI’s critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. Qualitative data synthesis will follow the JBI SUMARI meta-aggregation approach. Considerations of the certainty in the results will be reported in accordance with a ConQual Summary of Findings.

Funder

German Pension Insurance Berlin–Brandenburg

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference49 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3