Affiliation:
1. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, No. 28 West Xianning Road, Xi’an 710049, China
2. State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, No. 28 West Xianning Road, Xi’an 710049, China
Abstract
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, the physics-informed neural network (PINN) has gradually emerged as an effective and potential method for solving N-S equations. The treatment of constraints is vital to the PINN prediction accuracy. Compared to soft constraints, hard constraints are advantageous for the avoidance of difficulties in guaranteeing definite conditions and determining penalty coefficients. However, the principles on the formulation of hard constraints of PINN currently remain to be formed, which hinders the application of PINN in engineering fields. In this study, hard-constraint-based PINN models are constructed for Couette flow, plate shear flow and stenotic/aneurysmal flow with curved geometries. Particular efforts have been devoted to assessing the impact of the model parameters of hard constraints, i.e., degree and scaling factor, on the prediction accuracy of PINN at different Reynolds numbers. The results show that the degree is the most important factor that influences the prediction accuracy, followed by the scaling factor. As for the N-S equations, the degree of hard constraints should be at least two, while the scaling factor is recommended to be maintained around 1.0. The outcomes of the present work are of reference value for the development of PINN methods in fluid mechanics.
Funder
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures Project of China
Reference29 articles.
1. Slotnick, J., Khodadoust, J., Alonso, J., Darmofal, D., Gropp, W., Lurie, E., and Mavriplis, D. (2014). CFD Cision 2030 Study: A Path to Revolutionary Computational Aerosciences, NASA Technical Report NASA/CR-2014-218178; NASA Langley Research Center.
2. High performance computing techniques in CFD;Houzeaux;Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn.,2022
3. Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations;Lagaris;IEEE Transact. Neural Netw.,1998
4. Perspective on machine learning for advancing fluid mechanics;Brenner;Physic. Rev. Fluids,2019
5. Artificial neural networks trained through deep reinforcement learning discover control strategies for active flow control;Rabault;J. Fluid Mech.,2019