Clinical Utility of Pepsin and Bile Acid in Tracheal Secretions for Accurate Diagnosis of Aspiration in ICU Patients

Author:

Bandorski Dirk12ORCID,Tello Khodr3456,Erdal Harun3,Sommerlad Janine3,Wilhelm Jochen6,Vadasz Istvan3456,Hecker Matthias3456,Walmrath Dieter3,Seeger Werner34567,Krauss Ekaterina3ORCID,Kuhnert Stefan3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University Campus Hamburg, Lohmühlenstraße 5/Haus P, 20099 Hamburg, Germany

2. Intensive Care Medicine and Internal Diagnostics, Neurological Clinic Bad Salzhausen, 63667 Nidda, Germany

3. Department of Internal Medicine, Justus Liebig University, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), 35392 Giessen, Germany

4. German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 35392 Giessen, Germany

5. The Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), 35392 Giessen, Germany

6. Institute for Lung Health (ILH), 35392 Giessen, Germany

7. Department of Lung Development and Remodeling, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany

Abstract

Background: Aspiration of stomach content or saliva in critical conditions—e.g., shock, intoxication, or resuscitation—can lead to acute lung injury. While various biomarkers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids have been studied for diagnosing aspiration, none have been conclusively established as early indicators of lung damage. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of pepsin, bile acid, and other biomarkers for detecting aspiration in an intensive care unit (ICU). Materials and methods: In this study, 50 ICU patients were enrolled and underwent intubation before admission. The evaluation of aspiration was based on clinical suspicion or documented instances of observed events. Tracheal secretion (TS) samples were collected within 6 h after intubation using sterile suction catheters. Additional parameters, including IL-6, pepsin, and bile acid, were determined for analysis. Pepsin levels were measured with an ELISA kit, while bile acid, uric acid, glucose, IL-6, and pH value in the tracheal secretion were analyzed using standardized lab methods. Results: The 50 patients admitted to the ICU with various diagnoses. The median survival time for the entire cohort was 52 days, and there was no significant difference in survival between patients with aspiration pneumonia (AP) and those with other diagnoses (p = 0.69). Among the AP group, the average survival time was 50.51 days (±8.1 SD; 95% CI 34.63–66.39), while patients with other diagnoses had a mean survival time of 32.86 days (±5.1 SD; 95% CI 22.9–42.81); the survival group comparison did not yield statistically significant results. The presence of pepsin or bile acid in TS patients did not significantly impact survival or the diagnosis of aspiration. The p-values for the correlations between pepsin and bile acid with the aspiration diagnosis were p = 0.53 and p > 0.99, respectively; thus, pepsin and bile acid measurements did not significantly affect survival outcomes or enhance the accuracy of diagnosing aspiration pneumonia. Conclusions: The early and accurate diagnosis of aspiration is crucial for optimal patient care. However, based on this study, pepsin concentration alone may not reliably indicate aspiration, and bile acid levels also show limited association with the diagnosis. Further validation studies are needed to assess the clinical usefulness and reliability of gastric biomarkers in diagnosing aspiration-related conditions. Such future studies would provide valuable insights for improving aspiration diagnosis and enhancing patient care.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Ficke, B., Rajasurya, V., and Cascella, M. (2020). StatPearls: Chronic Aspiration, StatPearls Publishing.

2. Gastric Aspiration and Its Role in Airway Inflammation;Hunt;Open Respir. Med. J.,2018

3. Prophylactic Antimicrobial Therapy for Acute Aspiration Pneumonitis;Dragan;Clin. Infect. Dis.,2018

4. Aspiration pneumonia and pneumonitis;Neill;Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.,2019

5. Aspiration pneumonitis: Experimental studies and clinical observations;Hamelberg;Anesth. Analg.,1964

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3