Three Ablation Techniques for Atrial Fibrillation during Concomitant Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
-
Published:2023-09-01
Issue:17
Volume:12
Page:5716
-
ISSN:2077-0383
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCM
Author:
Hanafy Dudy Arman12ORCID, Erdianto Wahyu Prima2ORCID, Husen Theresia Feline3ORCID, Nathania Ilona3ORCID, Vidya Ananda Pipphali3ORCID, Angelica Ruth3ORCID, Suwatri Widya Trianita12, Lintangella Pasati1, Prasetyo Priscillia1, Sugisman 12
Affiliation:
1. Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jl. Salemba Raya No. 6, Kenari, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia 2. Division of Adult Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cardiovascular Center, Harapan Kita, Jakarta 11420, Indonesia 3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Pondok Cina, Beji, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a frequent procedure used in concomitant cardiac surgery. However, uncertainty still exists concerning the optimal extent of lesion sets. Hence, the objective of this study was to assess the results of various ablation techniques, aiming to offer a reference for clinical decision making. This review is listed in the prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under ID CRD42023412785. A comprehensive search was conducted across eight databases (Scopus, Google Scholar, EBSCOHost, PubMed, Medline, Wiley, ProQuest, and Embase) up to 18 April 2023. Studies were critically appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 for randomized control trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale adapted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) for cohort studies. Forest plots of pooled effect estimates and surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) were used for the analysis. Our analysis included 39 studies and a total of 7207 patients. Both bi-atrial ablation (BAA) and left atrial ablation (LAA) showed similar efficacy in restoring sinus rhythm (SR; BAA (77.9%) > LAA (76.2%) > pulmonary vein isolation (PVI; 66.5%); LAA: OR = 1.08 (CI 0.94–1.23); PVI: OR = 1.36 (CI 1.08–1.70)). However, BAA had higher pacemaker implantation (LAA: OR = 0.51 (CI 0.37–0.71); PVI: OR = 0.52 (CI 0.31–0.86)) and reoperation rates (LAA: OR = 0.71 (CI 0.28–1.45); PVI: OR = 0.31 (CI 0.1–0.64)). PVI had the lowest efficacy in restoring SR and a similar complication rate to LAA, but had the shortest procedure time (Cross-clamp (Xc): PVI (93.38) > LAA (37.36) > BAA (13.89)); Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB): PVI (93.93) > LAA (56.04) > BAA (0.03)). We suggest that LAA is the best surgical technique for AF ablation due to its comparable effectiveness in restoring SR, its lower rate of pacemaker requirement, and its lower reoperation rate compared to BAA. Furthermore, LAA ranks as the second-fastest procedure after PVI, with a similar CPB time.
Reference55 articles.
1. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: An increasing epidemic and public health challenge;Lippi;Int. J. Stroke,2021 2. McCarthy, P.M., Cox, J.L., Kislitsina, O.N., Kruse, J., Churyla, A., Malaisrie, S.C., and Mehta, C.K. (2021). Surgery and Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: History, Current Practice, and Future Directions. J. Clin. Med., 11. 3. Bi-atrial or left atrial ablation of atrial fibrillation during concomitant cardiac surgery: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials;Guo;J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.,2021 4. Catheter Ablation vs. Medical Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation;Ryad;Cureus,2020 5. Atrial fibrillation ablation strategies and technologies: Past, present, and future;Buist;Clin. Res. Cardiol.,2020
|
|