Inhibition of Caries around Restoration by Ion-Releasing Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Optical Coherence Tomography and Micro-Computed Tomography Evaluation

Author:

Albelasy Eman H.12,Chen Ruoqiong3,Fok Alex2,Montasser Marmar1,Hamama Hamdi H.14ORCID,Mahmoud Salah H.15,Abdelrehim Tamer2ORCID,Chew Hooi Pin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Algomhoria Street, Mansoura 35516, Egypt

2. Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

3. Department of Diagnostics and Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

4. Faculty of Dentistry, New-Mansoura University, New-Mansoura 35712, Egypt

5. Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Horus University, New-Dumyat 34517, Egypt

Abstract

The objective of this study was firstly to assess the demineralization inhibitory effect of ion-releasing restorations in enamel adjacent to restoration using a biofilm caries model and secondly to compare the effect to that in a chemical caries model. Fifty-six bovine incisors were filled with either Surefil one (SuO), Cention N (CN) (both ion-releasing materials), Ketac-Molar (GIC) or Powerfill resin composite (RC). The restored teeth were then randomly divided into 2 groups according to the used caries model (biofilm or chemical caries model). The micro-computed tomography (MicroCt) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) outcome measures used to evaluate demineralization inhibition effects were lesion depth, LD and increase in OCT integrated reflectivity, ΔIR, at five different depths. It was observed that all outcome measures of CN were statistically the same as those of GIC and conversely with those of RC. This was also the case for SuO except for LD, which was statistically the same as RC. When comparing the two caries models, LD of the biofilm model was statistically deeper (p < 0.05) than the chemical model for all four materials. In conclusion, CN and SuO have similar demineralization inhibitory effects as GIC, and the biofilm caries model is more discriminatory in differentiating demineralization inhibitory effects of ion-releasing restorative material.

Funder

3Mgives

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Materials Science

Reference49 articles.

1. Trends in restorative composites research: What is in the future?;Maas;Braz. Oral Res.,2017

2. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth;Worthington;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2021

3. Mechanical properties of experimental dental composites containing a combination of mesoporous and nonporous spherical silica as fillers;Samuel;Dent. Mater.,2009

4. Is secondary caries with composites a material-based problem?;Nedeljkovic;Dent. Mater.,2015

5. Secondary caries: What is it, and how it can be controlled, detected, and managed?;Askar;Clin. Oral Investig.,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3