Antibody–Drug Conjugates—Evolution and Perspectives
-
Published:2024-06-26
Issue:13
Volume:25
Page:6969
-
ISSN:1422-0067
-
Container-title:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJMS
Author:
Chis Adriana Aurelia1ORCID, Dobrea Carmen Maximiliana1ORCID, Arseniu Anca Maria1ORCID, Frum Adina1ORCID, Rus Luca-Liviu1ORCID, Cormos Gabriela1, Georgescu Cecilia2ORCID, Morgovan Claudiu1ORCID, Butuca Anca1ORCID, Gligor Felicia Gabriela1ORCID, Vonica-Tincu Andreea Loredana1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Medicine, “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania 2. Faculty of Agriculture Science, Food Industry and Environmental Protection, “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, 550012 Sibiu, Romania
Abstract
Antineoplastic therapy is one of the main research themes of this century. Modern approaches have been implemented to target and heighten the effect of cytostatic drugs on tumors and diminish their general/unspecific toxicity. In this context, antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a promising and successful strategy. The aim of this review was to assess different aspects regarding ADCs. They were presented from a chemical and a pharmacological perspective and aspects like structure, conjugation and development particularities alongside effects, clinical trials, safety issues and perspectives and challenges for future use of these drugs were discussed. Representative examples include but are not limited to the following main structural components of ADCs: monoclonal antibodies (trastuzumab, brentuximab), linkers (pH-sensitive, reduction-sensitive, peptide-based, phosphate-based, and others), and payloads (doxorubicin, emtansine, ravtansine, calicheamicin). Regarding pharmacotherapy success, the high effectiveness expectation associated with ADC treatment is supported by the large number of ongoing clinical trials. Major aspects such as development strategies are first discussed, advantages and disadvantages, safety and efficacy, offering a retrospective insight on the subject. The second part of the review is prospective, focusing on various plans to overcome the previously identified difficulties.
Reference176 articles.
1. Thurston, D.E., and Pysz, I. (2021). Chemistry and Pharmacology of Anticancer Drugs, CRC Press. [2nd ed.]. 2. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries;Sung;CA Cancer J. Clin.,2021 3. Chis, A.A., Arseniu, A.M., Morgovan, C., Dobrea, C.M., Frum, A., Juncan, A.M., Butuca, A., Ghibu, S., Gligor, F.G., and Rus, L.L. (2022). Biopolymeric Prodrug Systems as Potential Antineoplastic Therapy. Pharmaceutics, 14. 4. Drug Resistance and Combating Drug Resistance in Cancer;Wang;Cancer Drug Resist.,2019 5. Chis, A.A., Dobrea, C.M., Rus, L.L., Frum, A., Morgovan, C., Butuca, A., Totan, M., Juncan, A.M., Gligor, F.G., and Arseniu, A.M. (2021). Dendrimers as Non-Viral Vectors in Gene-Directed Enzyme Prodrug Therapy. Molecules, 26.
|
|