Accuracy Assessment of Surveying Strategies for the Characterization of Microtopographic Features That Influence Surface Water Flooding

Author:

Ramachandran Rakhee1,Bajón Fernández Yadira1ORCID,Truckell Ian1,Constantino Carlos2,Casselden Richard3,Leinster Paul1,Rivas Casado Mónica1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, College Road, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK

2. Atkins Limited, One St Aldates, St Aldate’s, Oxford OX1 1DE, UK

3. Atkins Limited, The Hub, 500 Park Avenue, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4RZ, UK

Abstract

With the increase in rainfall intensity, population, and urbanised areas, surface water flooding (SWF) is an increasing concern impacting properties, businesses, and human lives. Previous studies have shown that microtopography significantly influences flow paths, flow direction, and velocity, impacting flood extent and depth, particularly for the shallow flow associated with urban SWF. This study compares two survey strategies commonly used by flood practitioners, S1 (using Unmanned Aerial Systems-based RGB data) and S2 (using manned aircraft with LiDAR scanners), to develop guidelines on where to use each strategy to better characterise microtopography for a range of flood features. The difference between S1 and S2 in elevation and their accuracies were assessed using both traditional and robust statistical measures. The results showed that the difference in elevation between S1 and S2 varies between 11 cm and 37 cm on different land use and microtopographic flood features. Similarly, the accuracy of S1 ranges between 3 cm and 70 cm, and the accuracy of S2 ranges between 3.8 cm and 30.3 cm on different microtopographic flood features. Thus, this study suggests that the flood features of interest in any given flood study would be key to select the most suitable survey strategy. A decision framework was developed to inform data collection and integration of the two surveying strategies to better characterise microtopographic features. The findings from this study will help improve the microtopographic representation of flood features in flood models and, thus, increase the ability to identify high flood-risk prompt areas accurately. It would also help manage and maintain drainage assets, spatial planning of sustainable drainage systems, and property level flood resilience and insurance to better adapt to the effects of climate change. This study is another step towards standardising flood extent and impact surveying strategies.

Funder

Atkins Global

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Remote Sensing MDPI

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference63 articles.

1. World Meteorological Organisation WMO (2021, May 16). Provisional State of the Global Climate 2022. Available online: https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=22156#.ZCj4ktOS2Um.

2. State of the UK Climate 2019;Kendon;Int. J. Climatol.,2020

3. (2021, May 16). Environment Agency Surface Water: The Biggest Flood Risk of All, Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/surface-water-the-biggest-flood-risk-of-all.

4. (2021, August 25). Environment Agency Social Deprivation and the Likelihood of Flooding, Available online: http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environme.

5. (2021, August 25). Environment Agency Flooding in England: A National Assessment of Flood Risk, Available online: www.environment-agency.gov.uk.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3