Hierarchical Aggregation for Numerical Data under Local Differential Privacy
Author:
Hao Mingchao12ORCID, Wu Wanqing12, Wan Yuan12
Affiliation:
1. School of Cyber Security and Computer, Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China 2. Key Laboratory of High Trusted Information System in Hebei Province, Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China
Abstract
The proposal of local differential privacy solves the problem that the data collector must be trusted in centralized differential privacy models. The statistical analysis of numerical data under local differential privacy has been widely studied by many scholars. However, in real-world scenarios, numerical data from the same category but in different ranges frequently require different levels of privacy protection. We propose a hierarchical aggregation framework for numerical data under local differential privacy. In this framework, the privacy data in different ranges are assigned different privacy levels and then disturbed hierarchically and locally. After receiving users’ data, the aggregator perturbs the privacy data again to convert the low-level data into high-level data to increase the privacy data at each privacy level so as to improve the accuracy of the statistical analysis. Through theoretical analysis, it was proved that this framework meets the requirements of local differential privacy and that its final mean estimation result is unbiased. The proposed framework is combined with mini-batch stochastic gradient descent to complete the linear regression task. Sufficient experiments both on synthetic datasets and real datasets show that the framework has a higher accuracy than the existing methods in both mean estimation and mini-batch stochastic gradient descent experiments.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry
Reference26 articles.
1. Dwork, C., Kenthapadi, K., McSherry, F., Mironov, I., and Naor, M. (June, January 28). Our data, ourselves: Privacy via distributed noise generation. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, St. Petersburg, Russia. 2. Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., and Smith, A. (2006, January 4–7). Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis. Proceedings of the 3rd Theory of Cryptography Conference, New York, NY, USA. 3. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy;Dwork;Found. Trends Theor.Comput. Sci.,2014 4. What can we learn privately?;Kasiviswanathan;SIAM J. Comput.,2011 5. Duchi, J.C., Jordan, M.I., and Wainwright, M.J. (2013, January 26–29). Local privacy and statistical minimax rates. Proceedings of the IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Berkeley, CA, USA.
|
|