Abstract
This paper presents data from a three-year, mixed methods study into the rate and impact of ‘relocation’ as a response to extra-familial harm in adolescence by children’s social care teams. Participatory approaches to research design, data collection and analysis are used to gain insights from young people, parents/carers and professionals about the impact of relocations on safety. Professionals and young people report a range of harms implicated in the use of relocations, whilst sharing that the intervention often increases safety. Data are analysed zemiologically to understand this ambivalence, connecting micro accounts of harm with meso, institutional and macro structures that determine child protection intervention. Zemiology is put forward as a promising approach for a Critical Child Protection Studies.
Reference36 articles.
1. How child protection’s ‘investigative turn’ impacts on poor and deprived communities;Bilson;Family Law,2017
2. Using thematic analysis in psychology
3. Vulnerability and child sexual exploitation: Towards an approach grounded in life experiences
4. The Child Welfare Inequalities Project: Final Report;Bywaters,2020
5. The Relationship between Poverty, Child Abuse and Neglect: An Evidence Review;Bywaters,2016
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献