Affiliation:
1. Scientific Horizons Consulting, Irvine, CA 92617, USA
Abstract
The E-cigarette has been promoted as an alternative nicotine delivery device with potentially fewer toxicant emissions. The objective of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on the particle size distribution (PSD) of e-cigarette emissions and to analyze the knowledge gaps between existing particle size measurements and the vision toward harm reduction from e-cigarette use. Here, we focus on firstly describing the physical parameters used to characterize PSD, followed by comparing particle size measurement approaches, investigating the factors that impact the PSD of e-cigarette mainstream aerosols, and conclude by linking size distribution to the respiratory dosimetry by demonstrating the modeling results of particle deposition in the respiratory tract. This review calls for a harmonized testing protocol to conduct inter-comparisons and further understand e-cigarette particle sizes. Among the influencing factors investigated, puff topography, operation power, flavorings, PG/VG ratio, and nicotine strength impose a substantial impact on the PSD, but the underlying mechanisms have not yet been fully investigated. The effects brought by the type of device refill and nicotine are yet inconclusive due to lack of evidence. Coil aging has no significant impact on the PSD of e-cigarette aerosols within the coil lifetime. Lastly, while computational models of particle deposition have been adopted to profile the deposition of e-cigarette mainstream emissions, existing models have limited applicability and generality when dealing with e-cigarette aerosols that have high volatility and hygroscopicity, which can dynamically evaporate or grow during the transport process. Additionally, the size-dependent chemical composition (e.g., nicotine and harmful and potentially harmful constituents) of e-cigarette aerosols is unknown, impeding the understanding of the health effects of e-cigarette use. Therefore, it is essential for future studies to bridge these knowledge gaps and unveil the mechanisms determining PSD and respiratory deposition.
Reference103 articles.
1. Williams, M., and Talbot, P. (2019). Design Features in Multiple Generations of Electronic Cigarette Atomizers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.
2. Protano, C., Avino, P., Manigrasso, M., Vivaldi, V., Perna, F., Valeriani, F., and Vitali, M. (2018). Environmental Electronic Vape Exposure from Four Different Generations of Electronic Cigarettes: Airborne Particulate Matter Levels. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15.
3. Comprehensive overview of common e-liquid ingredients and how they can be used to predict an e-liquid’s flavour category;Havermans;Tob. Control,2021
4. Eaton, D.L., Kwan, L.Y., and Stratton, K. (2018). Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes, National Academies Press.
5. Characteristics of metallic nanoparticles emitted from heated Kanthal e-cigarette coils;Wilson;J. Nanopart. Res.,2019
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献