Patient Perspectives of Barriers and Facilitators for the Uptake of Pharmacogenomic Testing in Veterans Affairs’ Pharmacogenomic Testing for the Veterans (PHASER) Program

Author:

Melendez Karina1,Gutierrez-Meza Diana1,Gavin Kara L.1,Alagoz Esra1,Sperber Nina23ORCID,Wu Rebekah Ryanne45ORCID,Silva Abigail67,Pati Bhabna1,Voora Deepak45,Hung Allison1,Roberts Megan C.8,Voils Corrine I.19

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792, USA

2. Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA

3. Duke Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27701, USA

4. VA National Pharmacogenomics Program, Department of Veteran’s Affairs, Durham, NC 27705, USA

5. Department of Medicine, Duke Precision Medicine Program, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27599, USA

6. Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, IL 60141, USA

7. Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL 60153, USA

8. Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

9. William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI 53705, USA

Abstract

We applied implementation science frameworks to identify barriers and facilitators to veterans’ acceptance of pharmacogenomic testing (PGx), which was made available as a part of clinical care at 25 VA medical centers. We conducted 30 min interviews with veterans who accepted (n = 14), declined (n = 9), or were contemplating (n = 8) PGx testing. Six team members coded one transcript from each participant group to develop the codebook and finalize definitions. Three team members coded the remaining 28 transcripts and met regularly with the larger team to reach a consensus. The coders generated a matrix of implementation constructs by testing status to identify the similarities and differences between accepters, decliners, and contemplators. All groups understood the PGx testing procedures and possible benefits. In the decision-making, accepters prioritized the potential health benefits of PGx testing, such as reducing side effects or the number of medications. In contrast, decliners prioritized the possibilities of data breach or the negative impact on healthcare insurance or Veterans Affairs benefits. Contemplators desired to speak to a provider to learn more before making a decision. Efforts to improve the clarity of data security and the impact on benefits may improve veterans’ abilities to make more informed decisions about whether to undergo PGx testing.

Funder

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative

Health Services Research & Development Service

Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation

Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3