A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration

Author:

Shido Rena12,Ohba Seigo12ORCID,Tominaga Risa13,Sumita Yoshinori4ORCID,Asahina Izumi15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Regenerative Oral Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan

2. Center for Oral Implant, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan

3. Department of Psychosomatic Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan

4. Department of Medical Research and Development for Oral Disease, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan

5. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan

Abstract

Biodegradable guided bone regeneration (GBR) membranes consist primarily of collagen and aliphatic polyesters. This study assessed the comparative efficacy of a poly(l-lactic-caprolactone) [P(LA/CL)] membrane versus that of a collagen membrane in GBR. Patients requiring GBR simultaneously or before dental implant placement in edentulous regions were randomly assigned to one of two membranes. Within each membrane, they were subdivided into 3 groups: dental implants were placed simultaneously with GBR in groups A and B, and 180 days post-GBR in group C. The augmented bone width was measured at 1, 3, and 6 mm from the implant’s neck (groups A and B) or the reference line (group C), utilizing cone-beam computed tomography images, immediately and 150 days post-surgery. A histological study was performed to evaluate bone formation in group C. No adverse events were observed. In the collagen group, the absorbed ratios of the augmented bone were 40.9 ± 36.7%, 29.4 ± 30.1%, and 11.1 ± 22.0% at 1, 3, and 6 mm, respectively; the ratio at 6 mm was significantly lower than that at 1 mm (p = 0.0442). In the P(LA/CL) group, those were 26.2 ± 27.3%, 17.1 ± 19.7%, and 13.3 ± 16.4% at 1, 3, and 6 mm, respectively, with no significant difference at each point. No significant inter-membrane differences were observed. The bone augmentation potential of the P(LA/CL) membrane matched that of the collagen membrane. P(LA/CL) could be used as a safe and effective membrane in GBR.

Funder

GC Corporation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. A retrospective analysis of patients referred for implant placement to a specialty clinic: Indications, surgical procedures, and early failures;Bornstein;Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implant.,2008

2. “PASS” principles for predictable bone regeneration;Wang;Implant. Dent.,2006

3. Current barrier membranes: Titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications;Rakhmatia;J. Prosthodont. Res.,2013

4. Barrier membranes: More than the barrier effect?;Omar;J. Clin. Periodontol.,2019

5. Membranes for the guided bone regeneration;Lee;Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3