Affiliation:
1. Department of Forest and Wood Products Economics and Policy, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
2. Department of Territorial Studies, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
3. Department of Regional and Business Economics, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
Abstract
Globally, non-timber forest products (NTFPs) continue to contribute vastly to addressing the food, poverty reduction, income, and livelihood requirements of people in rural areas. However, as of now, there are no specific existing data highlighting the periodic contributions of NTFPs to the economy of the eastern region and the country. In Ghana, insufficient attention has been paid to the legislative and regulatory environments for the creation of NTFPs. Since forest policies continue to classify NTFPs as “minor” forest products, they receive less attention than wood in forest management initiatives and policies. The absence of a definitive policy on NTFPs has hampered their promotion, commercialization, and supply chain management. This study analyses the contribution of NTFPs towards economic development in the eastern region and the achievement of SDGs in Ghana. Through focus group discussions and a thematic analysis, it was concluded that NTFPs contribute immensely towards the economic development of the eastern region and the country through employment and direct taxes. Ultimately, it is evident from the study that the destruction of the Atiwa Forest Reserve for the purpose of bauxite mining will widely hinder the country’s achievement of its SDGs. Additionally, the study found that residents will continue to exploit forest resources if the core concerns of institutional deficiencies and rural poverty are not addressed. To curb this situation, there should be the sustainable, regulated, and authorized harvesting of NTFPs/NWFPs, community/user empowerment, and sectoral education and training programmes, etc. Even though these are common solutions, the study found them extremely rare within the study area.
Funder
Fund for Open Access publishing of the Mendel University in Brno
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference38 articles.
1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2014). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000, FAO. Available online: http://www.fao.org/forest-resources-assessment/past-assessments/fra-2000/en/.
2. Forest reliance across poverty groups in Tanzania;Dokken;Ecol. Econ.,2015
3. Sustainable Forest management in Europe’s East and West: Trajectories of development and the role of traditional knowledge. International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO);Angelstam;Conf. Proc.,2006
4. Food and Agriculture Organisation (2018). Forest Products, FAO Statistics Yearbook.
5. World Bank (2016). SABER: Equity and Inclusion Brief, World Bank. Available online: https://bit.ly/3zW9jJJ.