Television Debates as a TV Typology: Continuities and Changes in Televised Political Competition—The Case of the 2023 Pre-Election Debates in Greece

Author:

Bourchas Panagiotis Vasileios1,Gioltzidou Georgia2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Journalism & Mass Communications Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

2. School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University (HOU), 26335 Patras, Greece

Abstract

In the USA, for the first time in the 1960s, and in a very systematic manner from 1976 onwards, pre-election debates (televised presidential debates) have become a fundamental and integral method of communication for political parties, as well as an institution of American democracy that contributes significantly to shaping a culture of public political dialogue at a relatively high level, through which citizens accumulate knowledge about political figures and their parties’ positions within a very short period of time before the elections. In Greece, on the contrary, these television programs have not sparked significant interest to date. The subject of this study is the television debates in Greece, evaluated through a brief historical overview and commentary on their structure, culminating in the two televised confrontations that took place within a five-month period during two electoral contests in 2023. Firstly, the reactions to and reception of the two televised debates by citizens on platform X and, secondly, the commentary on the two debates by journalists, columnists, and renowned analysts, reveal the differing interests of both sides. The research results confirm that, in addition to the performance of politicians, citizens are also interested in the conditions and form in which these pre-election televised debates are staged.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference42 articles.

1. National politics on Twitter: Structures and topics of a networked public sphere;Ausserhofer;Information, Communication & Society,2013

2. Presidential debate watching, issue knowledge, character evaluation, and vote choice;Benoit;Human Communication Research,2004

3. A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates;Benoit;Communication Monographs,2003

4. Blumler, Jay, Coleman, Stephen, and Birchall, Christopher (2017). Debating the Debates; How Voters Viewed the Question Time Special, Electoral Reform Society.

5. Bruns, Axel, and Burgess, Jean (, January August). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. Presented at Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3