Digital News Bundles: Analyzing Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Cross-Publisher Journalistic Bundles

Author:

Erbrich Lukas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Journalism, Technical University Dortmund, 44227 Dortmund, Germany

Abstract

The landscape of journalism is rapidly evolving, with bundled subscription offerings from the New York Times, Apple and Schibsted becoming increasingly important. These offerings allow consumers to access a wide variety of content in multiple formats, representing a significant shift in how news and information are consumed. However, the impact of these offerings on publishers’ revenues remains underexplored in journalism and media research. This study aims to fill this gap by employing two different methodological approaches: the Gabor–Granger method and the Price Sensitivity Meter, enhanced by the Newton–Miller–Smith extension. It examines the willingness of a large sample (n = 6631) of the German online population to subscribe to cross-publisher offers. In contrast to other European media markets, cross-publisher bundling strategies are still in their infancy in Germany. The results suggest that bundled offers generate higher revenues for publishers than individual offers. This supports the introduction of internal “all-access” bundles within the European journalism sector, as well as external collaborations between unaffiliated publishers. However, the relatively small differences in revenues suggest that there is limited strong evidence to support the adoption of a centralized, cross-publisher “Spotify for News” model.

Funder

North Rhine-Westphalia Media Authority

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference54 articles.

1. How Can Publishers Collaborate and Compete with News Aggregators?;Amaldoss;Journal of Marketing Research,2023

2. Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits, and Efficiency;Bakos;Management Science,1999

3. Behre, Julia, Hölig, Sascha, and Möller, Judith (2024, August 15). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2023: Ergebnisse für Deutschland. Arbeitspapiere des Hans-Bredow-Instituts. Available online: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/86851.

4. It Is Not Just About Competition with “Free”: Differences Between Content Formats in Consumer Preferences and Willingness to Pay;Berger;Journal of Management Information Systems,2015

5. The unbundling of journalism;Bisceglia;European Economic Review,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3