Evaluation of Molecular Methods to Identify Chagas Disease and Leishmaniasis in Blood Donation Candidates in Two Brazilian Centers
-
Published:2023-03-24
Issue:4
Volume:12
Page:508
-
ISSN:2076-0817
-
Container-title:Pathogens
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Pathogens
Author:
Ferreira Juliana de Jesus Guimarães1ORCID, Costa Sandra Cecília Botelho1, Addas-Carvalho Marcelo2ORCID, Pereira Mariane Barroso1, França Adriana de Oliveira3, de Lima Rodrigo Gonçalves1, Andrade Paula Durante1, Wanderley Jamiro da Silva4, Martins Luiz Cláudio4, de Almeida Eros Antonio4, Marcon Gláucia Elisete Barbosa15
Affiliation:
1. Laboratório de Diagnóstico de Doenças Infecciosas por Técnicas de Biologia Molecular, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-887, SP, Brazil 2. Centro de Hematologia e Hemoterapia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-887, SP, Brazil 3. Laboratório de Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias (LabDIP), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária s/n, Campo Grande 79090-900, MS, Brazil 4. Grupo de Estudos em Doença de Chagas (GEDoCh), Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-887, SP, Brazil 5. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Mato Grosso do Sul (FIOCRUZ MS), Rua Gabriel Abrão, 92, Jardim das Nações, Campo Grande 79081-746, MS, Brazil
Abstract
In Brazil, blood donation is regulated by the Brazilian Ministry of Health, and all States follow the same protocol for clinical and laboratory screening. Brazil is an endemic country for Chagas disease (CD), caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, and for leishmaniasis, caused by a species of Leishmania spp. Screening for leishmaniosis is not routinely performed by blood banks. Given the antigenic similarity between T. cruzi and Leishmania spp., cross-reactions in serological tests can occur, and inconclusive results for CD have been found. The objective of this study was to apply molecular techniques, e.g., nPCR, PCR, and qPCR, to clarify cases of blood donation candidates with non-negative serology for CD and to analyze the difference between the melting temperature during real-time PCR using SYBR Green. Thirty-seven cases that showed non-negative results for CD using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) tests from blood banks in Campo Grande, MS, and Campinas, SP, were analyzed. In the serum samples, 35 samples were evaluated by ELISA, and 24.3% (9/35) showed positive results for CD. nPCR was able to detect 12 positive results in 35 samples (34.28%). qPCR for T. cruzi was quantifiable in the samples that showed a value ≥0.002 par eq/mL (parasite equivalents per milliliter), and in 35 samples, 11 (31.42%) were positive. Of all evaluated samples using the described tests (CMIA, ELISA, nPCR, and qPCR), 18 (48.6%) were positive for CD. For MCA by qPCR, the melting temperature was 82.06 °C ± 0.46 for T. cruzi and 81.9 °C ± 0.24 for Leishmania infantum. The Mann–Whitney test showed a significant value of p < 0.0001. However, the differentiation between T. cruzi and L. infantum could not be considered due to temperature overlap. For leishmaniasis, of the 35 samples with non-negative serology for CD tested by the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), only one sample (2.85%) was positive (1:80). The PCR for Leishmania spp. was performed on 36 blood samples from donation candidates, and all were negative. qPCR for L. infantum showed 37 negative results for the 37 analyzed samples. The data presented here show the importance of performing two different tests in CD screening at blood banks. Molecular tests should be used for confirmation, thereby improving the blood donation system.
Funder
Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),General Immunology and Microbiology,Molecular Biology,Immunology and Allergy
Reference49 articles.
1. ANVISA–Agência nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (2022, April 15). 6 Boletim de Produção Hemoterápica, Available online: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/centraisdeconteudo/publicacoes/sangue-tecidos-celulas-e-orgaos/producao-e-avaliacao-de-servicos-de-hemoterapia/6deg-boletim-de-producao-hemoterapica-2018.pdf/view. 2. BRASIL (2022, April 15). Resolução RDC nº 343, de 13 de dezembro de 2002. Diário Oficial da União, seção 1, p.133–143, Available online: https://pesquisa.in.gov.br/imprensa/jsp/visualiza/index.jsp?data=19/12/2002&jornal=1&pagina=133&totalArquivos=336. 3. World Health Organization (2020, May 13). Chagas Disease (American Trypanosomiasis), Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs340/en/. 4. The main sceneries of Chagas disease transmission. The vectors, blood and oral transmissions—A comprehensive review;Coura;Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz,2015 5. Ecoepidemiology, short history and control of Chagas disease in the endemic countries and the new challenge for non-endemic countries;Junqueira;Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz,2014
|
|