Dynamics of Infections in Cattle and Rhipicephalus microplus: A Preliminary Study
-
Published:2023-07-30
Issue:8
Volume:12
Page:998
-
ISSN:2076-0817
-
Container-title:Pathogens
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Pathogens
Author:
Piloto-Sardiñas Elianne12ORCID, Foucault-Simonin Angélique1, Wu-Chuang Alejandra1, Mateos-Hernández Lourdes1ORCID, Marrero-Perera Roxana2ORCID, Abuin-Denis Lianet1ORCID, Roblejo-Arias Lisset2, Díaz-Corona Cristian2, Zając Zbigniew3ORCID, Kulisz Joanna3ORCID, Woźniak Aneta3ORCID, Moutailler Sara1ORCID, Corona-González Belkis2, Cabezas-Cruz Alejandro1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. ANSES, INRAE, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, UMR BIPAR, Laboratoire de Santé Animale, Maisons-Alfort 94700, France 2. Direction of Animal Health, National Center for Animal and Plant Health, Carretera de Tapaste y Autopista Nacional, Apartado Postal 10, San José de las Lajas 32700, Mayabeque, Cuba 3. Department of Biology and Parasitology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 11 St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
Abstract
Tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) pose a significant threat to livestock, including bovine species. This study aimed to investigate TBPs in cattle and ticks across four sampling points, utilizing real-time microfluidic PCR. The results revealed that Rhipicephalus microplus ticks were found infesting all animals. Among the detected TBPs in cattle, Anaplasma marginale was the most frequently identified, often as a single infection, although mixed infections involving Rickettsia felis, uncharacterized Rickettsia sp., and Anaplasma sp. were also observed. In ticks, A. marginale was predominant, along with R. felis, Rickettsia sp., and Ehrlichia sp. It is noteworthy that although A. marginale consistently infected all cattle during various sampling times, this pathogen was not detected in all ticks. This suggests a complex dynamic of pathogen acquisition by ticks. A phylogenetic analysis focused on the identification of Anaplasma species using amplified 16S rDNA gene fragments revealed the presence of A. marginale and Anaplasma platys strains in bovines. These findings underscore the presence of multiple TBPs in both cattle and ticks, with A. marginale being the most prevalent. Understanding the dynamics and phylogenetics of TBPs is crucial for developing effective control strategies to mitigate tick-borne diseases in livestock.
Funder
Embassy of France in Cuba French Government’s Investissement d’Avenir program, Laboratoire d’Excellence “Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases” Programa Nacional de Becas de Postgrado en el Exterior “Don Carlos Antonio López”
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),General Immunology and Microbiology,Molecular Biology,Immunology and Allergy
Reference65 articles.
1. Kolte, S.W., Larcombe, S.D., Jadhao, S.G., Magar, S.P., Warthi, G., Kurkure, N.V., Glass, E.J., and Shiels, B.R. (2017). PCR diagnosis of tick-borne pathogens in Maharashtra state, India indicates fitness cost associated with carrier infections is greater for crossbreed than native cattle breeds. PLoS ONE, 12. 2. Cattle anaplasmosis and babesiosis: Major tick-borne diseases affecting the cattle industry in Khartoum State, Sudan;Satti;Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep.,2021 3. Zhou, Z., Li, K., Sun, Y., Shi, J., Li, H., Chen, Y., Yang, H., Li, X., Wu, B., and Li, X. (2019). Molecular epidemiology and risk factors of Anaplasma spp., Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. infection in cattle in Chongqing, China. PLoS ONE, 14. 4. Bovine Ehrlichiosis Prevalence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Molecular Studies;Barato;World Vet. J.,2021 5. Emerging perspectives in the research of bovine babesiosis and anaplasmosis;Suarez;Vet. Parasitol.,2011
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|