Next Article in Journal
Preservation of scRNA-Seq Libraries Using Existing Inactivation Protocols
Previous Article in Journal
Pseudopropionibacterium propionicum as a Cause of Empyema; A Diagnosis with Next-Generation Sequencing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Epidemiological Investigation of Tick-Borne Bacterial Pathogens in Domestic Animals from the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau Area, China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/pathogens13020166
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epidemiology of Ocular Thelaziosis in Domestic Dogs in Beijing

by
Zichen Liu
,
Chang Yu
,
Xiaoli Tan
,
Ni Chen
and
Yipeng Jin
*
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Rd, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2024, 13(2), 166; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13020166
Submission received: 22 December 2023 / Revised: 21 January 2024 / Accepted: 11 February 2024 / Published: 12 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Parasites: Epidemiology, Treatment and Control: 2nd Edition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Thelazia callipaeda is a zoonotic parasitic nematode that lives in the ocular conjunctival sac of domestic and wild carnivores, lagomorphs, and humans, with Phortica spp. as its intermediate host. At present, the important role that domestic dogs play in thelaziosis has been studied in many countries. However, Beijing, which is the first city in China to experience human thelaziosis, has not yet conducted a comprehensive epidemiological analysis of the disease. In this study, we analyzed risk factors (region, season, age, sex, breed, size, living environment, diet, country park travel history, immunization history, anthelmintic treatment history, and ocular clinical symptoms) associated with the prevalence of thelaziosis in domestic dogs in Beijing. The overall prevalence of T. callipaeda in the study area was 3.17% (102/3215 domestic dogs; 95% CI 2.57–3.78%). The results of the risk factor analysis showed that thelaziosis in domestic dogs from Beijing was significantly correlated with regional distribution, seasonal distribution, country park travel history, and anthelmintic treatment history (p < 0.05). In summer and autumn, domestic dogs living in mountainous areas, with a history of country park travel and without deworming were 4.164, 2.382, and 1.438 times more infected with T. callipaeda than those living in plain areas without a history of country park travel and with a history of deworming (OR = 4.164, OR = 2.382, OR = 1.438, respectively). T. callipaeda-infected domestic dogs did not always show any ocular clinical symptoms, while symptomatic domestic dogs were mainly characterized by moderate symptoms. The results indicate that in summer and autumn, preventive anthelmintic treatment should be strengthened for domestic dogs with a country park travel history or those living in mountain areas. At the same time, we should be vigilant about taking domestic dogs to play in country parks or mountainous areas during summer and autumn because this may pose a potential risk of the owner being infected with T. callipaeda.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Thelazia callipaeda is a zoonotic parasitic nematode that lives in the ocular conjunctival sac of domestic and wild carnivores and lagomorphs, resulting in thelaziosis [1]. It uses Phortica spp. (fruit flies) as its intermediate host and transmission vector [2]. Because thelaziosis is distributed in many areas of Southeast Asia, it is also known as the oriental eyeworm [1]. The damage caused to the ocular area by T. callipaeda varies. Some infected dogs display foreign body sensations and increased ocular secretion, resulting in conjunctival edema, congestion, corneal ulcers, and even secondary glaucoma [3]. Severe cases can also cause blindness [1].
In 1917, human thelaziosis was reported for the first time in Beijing and Fujian, China [4,5]. In Europe, Italy has the largest number of cases of animal thelaziosis and is the first country to report the infection [1,6]. In the past 30 years, the number of cases of animal thelaziosis in Europe has gradually increased, including countries such as France, Spain, Belgium, Switzerland, Portugal, Romania, the United Kingdom, Greece, Hungary, Austria, and Germany [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. From 1917 to 2020, a total of 658 cases of human thelaziosis were recorded in China [18]. The prevalence of thelaziosis is closely related to the age, sex, occupation, health condition, and density of the population within the epidemic area [18]. The data show that the prevalence of thelaziosis is highest in children aged 0–5 years old, which correlates strongly with their inability to avoid Phortica spp. The prevalence of thelaziosis is highest in outdoor occupations such as forest workers, which is related to the distribution density of Phortica spp. It is generally believed that infected domestic animals (dogs and cats) are the most important reservoir hosts of T. callipaeda [19], which directly threatens human health. Previously, cases of thelaziosis in dogs and humans were mainly reported in areas with poor economic and health conditions and large populations of domestic animals or wildlife [20,21]. In the villages around wildlife nature reserves in China, it was found that in 2019, the prevalence of domestic dog thelaziosis was as high as 84.62% (88/104), which was higher than that in 2016 (38.05%, 43/113), 2017 (53.92%, 55/102), and 2018 (56.25%, 63/112) [22]. Wildlife is also an important link in the transmission chain of T. callipaeda, especially in villages [9,23]. For example, a high-density distribution of red foxes in Europe often coincides with Phortica spp. during their active periods of the day; offspring red foxes’ habit of detaching and spreading from their original population also promotes the spread of T. callipaeda between regions [24,25]. Therefore, we should also pay attention to the role of wild carnivorous animals in introducing T. callipaeda into areas where there were no previous cases of thelaziosis, as well as their role in leading to the persistence and spread of an epidemic [24]. However, the overall impact of the diseases they cause in dogs and humans is not fully recognized in many respects, and 45% of the total human population of Europe, as well as their domestic and companion animals, are exposed to the risk of vector-borne zoonosis [26].
In order to investigate the prevalence of domestic dog thelaziosis in Beijing, this study collected clinical data on cases of domestic dog thelaziosis treated in the China Agricultural University Teaching Animal Hospital from 2018 to 2019, including region, season, age, sex, breed, size, living environment, diet, country park travel history, immunization history, anthelmintic treatment history, and ocular clinical symptoms. By organizing and analyzing the clinical data, we reveal the risk factors for the prevalence of domestic dog thelaziosis in Beijing, ultimately providing prevention and control strategies for local thelaziosis and maintaining local public health safety.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Clinical Data Recording

Between 2018 and 2019, a total of 3215 domestic dogs were presented to the China Agricultural University Teaching Animal Hospital, located in Beijing (China), for an ocular health examination. Among them, 102 domestic dogs were infected with ocular nematodes. Infection was determined using a slit lamp under local anesthesia of the ocular region (0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride, Alcaine®, Alcon, Puurs, Belgium). These nematodes were removed and placed in a sterile collection tube containing 95% alcohol for subsequent identification. A total of 1277 nematodes were collected. We recorded the clinical data of each domestic dog, including region, season, age, sex, breed, size, living environment, diet, country park travel history (yes or no), immunization history (yes or no), anthelmintic treatment history (yes or no), and ocular clinical symptoms.

2.2. Morphological Observations

The nematodes collected from the eyes of each domestic dog were examined under an optical microscope combined with a camera (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and identified based on their morphology by using taxonomic keys [27].

2.3. Molecular Biology Confirmation

We extracted genomic DNA from nematodes collected from the conjunctival sacs of each domestic dog using HiPure Tissue & Blood DNA Kits (Magen, Guangzhou, China). A total of 102 samples were extracted. A partial sequence of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (cox1; 689 base pairs) was amplified using PCR [28]. Amplicons were purified by a HiPure Gel Pure Micro Kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China) and sequenced in an ABI3730XL with a BigDyeTr v3.1 Cycle Seq Kit (Applied Biosystems, Wakefield, RI, USA) [22]. Amplicon sequences were determined in both directions and genetic analyses were performed using available sequences of related nematodes from the GenBank and the Global Initiative on Sharing all Influenza Data (GISAID) database (https://www.gisaid.org, accessed on 24 January 2023).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The clinical data of each domestic dog were entered into Microsoft Excel for classification and sorting, and the prevalence of different groups was calculated. The statistical analysis software SPSS Statistics v20 (IBM, New York, NY, USA) was adopted for statistics and data processing. The Chi-square test was used to compare and analyze the correlation between the prevalence of domestic dog thelaziosis and the risk factors (region, season, age, sex, breed, size, living environment, diet, country park travel history, immunization history, and anthelmintic treatment history) at a significance level of 5%. Associations between explanatory variables and the outcome were analyzed by logistic regression models [29]. The results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

3. Results

3.1. Overall Prevalence of Thelaziosis in Domestic Dogs

As determined through slit-lamp observation, the nematode adults were slender, milky white, and cylindrical (Figure 1A). The buccal capsule, pharynx, esophagus, and cuticle striations were visible under the optical microscope (Figure 1B). Adult female nematodes possess a vulva at the anterior end (Figure 1B), as well as larvae and oval-shaped eggs in the mid-section of the uterus (Figure 1C). Adult male nematodes possess spicules that bend towards the ventral side at the posterior end (Figure 1D). A total of 1277 nematodes from these 102 domestic dogs were identified as T. callipaeda from their morphological characteristics. Out of the 1277 nematodes, 842 were morphologically identified as female and 435 as male T. callipaeda.
The morphological identification was confirmed by molecular analysis. The homology rate of nucleic acid samples from 102 domestic dogs was 100%. Through blast analysis, a representative sequence (GenBank accession no. MN719910) obtained from all the nematodes examined showed 98.79% nuclear similarity compared to the T. callipaeda sequence obtained from Chinese dogs (GenBank access no. MT040341).
The average number of T. callipaeda carried by each domestic dog was 7.80 ± 8.51 in the oculus sinister and 8.00 ± 9.08 in the oculus dexter. The overall prevalence of T. callipaeda was 3.17% (102/3215; 95% CI 2.57–3.78%) (Table 1).

3.2. Effect of Regional Distribution on Prevalence

Among the 3215 domestic dogs that underwent an ocular health examination in Beijing, 2181 domestic dogs came from plain areas and 1034 domestic dogs came from mountainous areas. Among the 2181 domestic dogs from plain areas, 57 cases were infected with T. callipaeda, with a prevalence of 2.61% (Figure 2). Among the 1034 domestic dogs from mountainous areas, 45 cases were infected with T. callipaeda, with a prevalence of 4.35% (Figure 2). The prevalence of thelaziosis in domestic dogs from mountainous areas was significantly higher than that from plain areas (χ2 = 6.902, df = 1, p-value = 0.009) (Table 1). Regional distribution had a significant effect on thelaziosis in domestic dogs.

3.3. Effect of Seasonal Distribution on Prevalence

The numbers of domestic dogs who underwent an ocular health examination in spring, summer, autumn, and winter were 780, 936, 827, and 672, respectively, for which the numbers of thelaziosis cases were 15, 40, 35, and 12, respectively. The prevalence of different seasonal distributions was 1.92% (15/780), 4.27% (40/936), 4.23% (35/827), and 1.79% (12/672), respectively. According to the Chi-square test (χ2 = 14.887, df = 3, p-value = 0.002), seasonal distribution had a significant effect on thelaziosis infection in domestic dogs (p < 0.05) (Table 1). The prevalence in summer (June to August) and autumn (September to November) was significantly higher than that in spring (March to May) and winter (December to February), but there was no significant difference between spring and winter or between summer and autumn.

3.4. Effect of Country Park Travel History on Prevalence

Among the 3215 domestic dogs who underwent an ocular health examination, 309 cases had a country park travel history and 2906 cases did not, for which the numbers of thelaziosis cases were 16 and 86, respectively. The prevalence of thelaziosis in dogs with different travel histories was 5.18% (16/309) and 2.96% (86/2906), respectively. According to the Chi-square test (χ2 = 4.475, df = 1, p-value = 0.034), the prevalence of thelaziosis in domestic dogs with a country park travel history was significantly higher than that in domestic dogs who had not traveled (p < 0.05) (Table 1).

3.5. Effect of Individual Factors on Prevalence

3.5.1. Age

In this study, 102 cases of thelaziosis were identified in adult domestic dogs over 1 year old, aged between 1 and 15 years old. Therefore, puppies under 1 year old were excluded among the 3215 domestic dogs that underwent an ocular health examination, and 2768 adult domestic dogs’ clinical data were retained for statistical analysis. The numbers of domestic dogs who underwent an ocular health examination in the young (≤7 years old) and older (>7 years old) groups were 1592 and 1176, respectively, of which 66 and 36 were identified as thelaziosis cases, respectively. The prevalence of thelaziosis in the different age groups was 4.15% (66/1592) and 3.06% (36/1176), respectively. According to the Chi-square test (χ2 = 2.241, df = 1, p-value = 0.134), the age of domestic dogs had no significant effect on the prevalence of thelaziosis (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

3.5.2. Sex

Among the 3215 domestic dogs who underwent an ocular health examination, 1821 were male and 1394 were female, for which the numbers of thelaziosis cases were 59 and 43, respectively. The prevalence of thelaziosis in the different sexes was 3.24% (59/1821) and 3.08% (43/1394), respectively. According to the Chi-square test (χ2 = 0.062, df = 1, p-value = 0.803), sex had no significant effect on the prevalence of thelaziosis (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

3.5.3. Breed

The domestic dogs who underwent an ocular health examination collected in this study included 2753 purebred domestic dogs and 462 hybrid domestic dogs, for which the numbers of thelaziosis cases were 88 and 14, respectively. The prevalence of thelaziosis in the different breeds was 3.20% (88/2753) and 3.03% (14/462), respectively. According to the results of the Chi-square test (χ2 = 0.036, df = 1, p-value = 0.850), the breed had no significant effect on the prevalence of thelaziosis (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

3.5.4. Size

Overall, 659, 836, 1479, and 241 domestic dogs who underwent an ocular health examination were small (<10 kg, <40 cm tall), medium (10–25 kg, 40–60 cm tall), large (26–45 kg, 61–70 cm tall), and giant domestic dogs (>45 kg, >70 cm tall), respectively, for which the numbers of thelaziosis cases were 25, 27, 41, and 9, respectively. The prevalence of thelaziosis in the different sizes of dogs was 3.79% (25/659), 3.23% (27/836), 2.77% (41/1479), and 3.73% (9/241), respectively. According to the results of the Chi-square test (χ2 = 1.856, df = 3, p-value = 0.603), size had no significant effect on the prevalence of thelaziosis (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

3.6. Effect of Feeding and Management Factors on Prevalence

3.6.1. Living Environment

Overall, 2289, 416, and 510 domestic dogs came from a house, a kennel, or a free-range living environment, respectively, for which the numbers of thelaziosis cases were 67, 12, and 23, respectively. The prevalence of thelaziosis in the different living environments was 2.93% (67/2289), 2.88% (12/416), and 4.51% (23/510), respectively. According to the results of the Chi-square test (χ2 = 3.530, df = 2, p-value = 0.171), the living environment had no significant effect on the prevalence of thelaziosis (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

3.6.2. Diet

According to the different types of food fed daily, the cases collected in this study were divided into two categories. Overall, 2607 domestic dogs ate commercial dog food, and 608 domestic dogs ate self-made food, for which the numbers of thelaziosis cases were 80 and 22, respectively. The prevalence of thelaziosis in dogs with different diets was 3.07% (80/2607) and 3.62% (22/608), respectively. According to the analysis results of the Chi-square test (χ2 = 0.485, df = 1, p-value = 0.486), the type of diet had no significant effect on the prevalence of thelaziosis (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

3.6.3. Immunization History

A total of 2169 and 1046 domestic dogs in this study had been completely and incompletely immunized (within 1 year), respectively, for which the numbers of thelaziosis cases were 65 and 37, respectively. The prevalence of thelaziosis in dogs with and without complete immunization was 3.00% (65/2169) and 3.54% (37/1046), respectively. According to the analysis results of the Chi-square test (χ2 = 0.671, df = 1, p-value = 0.413), the completeness of immunization history had no significant effect on the prevalence of thelaziosis (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

3.6.4. Anthelmintic Treatment History

The numbers of domestic dogs treated and not treated with an anthelmintic in the past 3 months were 2138 and 1077, respectively, for which the numbers of thelaziosis cases were 56 and 46, respectively. The prevalence of thelaziosis in dogs with and without an anthelmintic was 2.62% (56/2138) and 4.27% (46/1077), respectively. According to the Chi-square test (χ2 = 6.362, df = 1, p-value = 0.012), the prevalence of thelaziosis in domestic dogs without anthelmintic treatment was significantly higher than domestic dogs with anthelmintic treatment (p < 0.05) (Table 1).

3.7. Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors Influencing the Prevalence of Domestic Dog Thelaziosis in Summer and Autumn

In summer and autumn, domestic dogs with thelaziosis were used as the dependent variable (No = 0 and Yes = 1), and the history of the region, country park travel history, and anthelmintic treatment history were used as independent variables. Logistic regression analysis showed that region, country park travel history, and anthelmintic treatment history were independent risk factors for the prevalence of domestic dog thelaziosis in summer and autumn (p < 0.05). In summer and autumn, domestic dogs living in mountainous areas, with a history of country parks travel and without deworming were 4.164, 2.382, and 1.438 times more infected with T. callipaeda than those living in plain areas without a history of country parks travel and with a history of deworming (OR = 4.164, OR = 2.382, and OR = 1.438, respectively) (Table 2).

3.8. Effect of T. callipaeda Carrying Capacity on Ocular Clinical Symptoms

A total of 111 infected eyes carried 1–10 T. callipaeda, 35 infected eyes carried 11–20 T. callipaeda, and 18 infected eyes carried over 20 T. callipaeda. It is worth noting that 11 T. callipaeda-infected eyes did not show any clinical symptoms, with 4 infected eyes carrying over 10 T. callipaeda. The results also found that the T. callipaeda-infected eyes with moderate symptoms (increased ocular secretion and purulent secretion with conjunctivitis) accounted for the largest proportion (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Further exploration of the relationship between prevalence and various risk factors showed that the epidemiological characteristics of thelaziosis were significantly correlated with regional distribution, seasonal distribution, country park travel history, and anthelmintic treatment history. However, they were not significantly correlated with individual factors (age, sex, breed, and size), living environment, diet, or immunization history. Multivariate analysis indicated that regional distribution, country park travel history, and anthelmintic treatment history were associated with an increased risk of domestic dog thelaziosis in summer and autumn.
Due to a relative lack of epidemiological survey data for domestic dog thelaziosis cases in China, compared with survey results from abroad, the total prevalence obtained in this test was low. Although it was similar to the prevalence (3.8%) and carrying capacity (8.08 ± 9.49) of pet dogs in Portugal [30], it was different from the prevalence (26.1%, 33.1%, and 68.0%) of dogs in Spain [31]. The variance was large, and the main reason may be the differences in sampling areas and subjects. The sampling site of this test was Beijing, and the sampling objects were mainly domestic dogs. The sampling area of dogs in Spain [31] was in the same latitude range as China, but there were many wildlife and fruit plantations in this area. In addition, the collection subjects with the highest prevalence (68.0%) were hounds with a high prevalence risk.
According to European survey data, in areas with high dog populations, there are more cases involving hosts such as cats and foxes [11,30]. In European countries where they are not endemic, the geographical distribution of thelaziosis is attributed to the dispersion of several wildlife species, including wild carnivores (such as the red fox, wolf, and badger) and rabbits [12]. According to a previous study, in Korea, the prevalence of thelaziosis in military dogs is as high as 33.5%, 12.4 times that of farm dogs, mainly because military dogs are raised in mountainous areas [32]. Research results support not only the existence of a mountainous area life cycle of T. callipaeda but also indicate that it is maintained mainly by foxes and secondarily by a large number of wildlife species [33]. In 2019, giant pandas, wild boars, leopard cats, and black bears were found to be newly infected with T. callipaeda in the Qinling Mountains of China. The prevalence of domestic dog thelaziosis in the surrounding villages also showed an increasing trend year by year, and the density of Phortica spp. in the mountainous area increased sharply; these results indicate that there is a transmission cycle of T. callipaeda among wildlife in the mountainous areas of China [22]. The results of our study and previous studies suggest that domestic dogs frequently exposed to mountainous areas or country parks are more likely to come into contact with T. callipaeda-infected wildlife and Phortica spp., resulting in a relatively higher prevalence of thelaziosis.
The results showed that seasonal distribution has a significant effect on thelaziosis infection in domestic dogs. The prevalence in summer and autumn was significantly higher than in spring and winter. This result is related to the reproductive law of Phortica spp., whose reproduction, density, and biological activity vary seasonally according to climatic conditions [2,22]. Therefore, thelaziosis occurrence may be seasonal. According to a study on Phortica spp. in Spain, the number of Phortica spp. captured was largest when the average daily temperature was 24.5–26.0 °C, and no Phortica spp. were captured when the daily average temperature was 8.8 °C; the density and number of Phortica spp. increased with warmer temperatures, and the proportion of male Phortica spp. (79.65%) was significantly higher than female Phortica spp. (20.35%) [31]. Generally, only male Phortica spp. feed on animals and human ocular secretions [1]. Therefore, the number of male Phortica spp. increases significantly with warmer summer temperatures. The transmission capacity also peaks during this time, and thus, the prevalence is at its highest in summer and autumn. In addition, the study data also showed that the proportion of male Phortica spp. is positively correlated with the temperature at the time of capture, and at lower temperatures, the proportion of female Phortica spp. will be higher [34]. As mature female T. callipaeda continuously releases larvae (L1) during the active period to maintain their reproductive cycle, infectious Phortica spp. from the previous year can move again in early spring after overwintering [35]. Therefore, there is still a risk of infection in spring and winter.
In this study, the prevalence of thelaziosis in domestic dogs without deworming was significantly higher than in domestic dogs with deworming. Anthelmintics can have an effect on thelaziosis prevention. Because the animal owners were unsure about the compounds of the anthelmintic drugs purchased, there was no analysis of the relationship between the compounds of the anthelmintic drugs used on domestic dogs and the prevalence of thelaziosis. Many studies have shown that the application of moxidectin, imidacloprid, and milbemycin oxime was highly effective in the treatment of canine thelaziosis caused by T. callipaeda [25,36,37]. These compounds are also common in most anthelmintic drugs for dogs that are currently available in China. In the future, more clinical data on anthelmintic drugs (such as active compounds and frequency of use) should be collected for further study.
According to the analysis, the number of monocular T. callipaeda and ocular clinical symptoms from 102 domestic dog thelaziosis cases were tallied and classified. Cases with moderate symptoms (increased ocular secretion and purulent secretion with conjunctivitis) accounted for the largest proportion, although there were domestic dogs with T. callipaeda that did not show any ocular clinical symptoms (Table 3). In general, because the movement of T. callipaeda directly damages the conjunctival sac and other parts, it is reasonable to deduce that ocular clinical symptoms will increase with the number of monocular T. callipaeda. However, our results do not support this assumption. According to a previous study, the severity of ocular clinical symptoms is not related to the number of infected nematodes [38], which concurs with the results of this test. Other study data show that the prevalence of thelaziosis in dogs with ocular clinical symptoms was significantly higher than in asymptomatic dogs [30]. However, it is also emphasized that in the early stages of infection, animals usually do not exhibit obvious ocular clinical symptoms; therefore, they may be missed by owners and veterinarians.

5. Conclusions

Thelaziosis infection in domestic dogs from Beijing was significantly correlated with regional distribution, seasonal distribution, country park travel history, and anthelmintic treatment history. In addition, the regional distribution, country park travel history, and anthelmintic treatment history were associated with an increased risk of domestic dog thelaziosis in summer and autumn. This suggests that if a domestic dog has a history of country park travel or lives in a mountainous area, whether there are ocular clinical symptoms or not, regular internal and external anthelmintics should be administered according to the procedure. Furthermore, we should be vigilant about taking domestic dogs to play in country parks or mountainous areas during summer and autumn because this may pose a potential risk of the owner being infected with T. callipaeda. The owner should pay special attention to ocular hygiene and guard against the possibility of zoonotic diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.L., C.Y., and Y.J.; methodology, Z.L., C.Y., and Y.J.; software, Z.L., C.Y., X.T., and N.C.; validation, Z.L. and C.Y.; formal analysis, Z.L. and C.Y.; investigation, X.T. and N.C.; resources, Z.L., X.T., and Y.J.; data curation, Z.L., C.Y., X.T., and N.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.L., C.Y., and X.T.; writing—review and editing, Z.L., C.Y., and X.T.; visualization, Z.L. and Y.J.; supervision, Y.J.; project administration, Z.L., X.T., and Y.J.; funding acquisition, Z.L., C.Y., and Y.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation Project of China (grant number: 32273076).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal experimental protocol in this study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of China Agricultural University, Beijing (no. AW32011202-2-1).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the China Agricultural University Teaching Animal Hospital in Beijing. We gratefully acknowledge Zheng Fang, Kaiming Zhang, and Wanrong Song for their help with data analysis, and Qinghui Mu for help with manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Otranto, D.; Mendoza-Roldan, J.A.; Dantas-Torres, F. Thelazia callipaeda . Trends Parasitol. 2020, 37, 263–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Otranto, D.; Lia, R.P.; Cantacessi, C.; Testini, G.; Troccoli, A.; Shen, J.L.; Wang, Z.X. Nematode biology and larval development of Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in the drosophilid intermediate host in Europe and China. Parasitology 2005, 131, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Otranto, D.; Traversa, D. Thelazia eyeworm: An original endo- and ecto-parasitic nematode. Trends Parasitol. 2005, 21, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stuckey, E.J. CIRCUMOCULAR FILARIASIS. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1917, 1, 542–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shen, J.; Gasser, R.B.; Chu, D.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, X.; Cantacessi, C.; Otranto, D. Human Thelaziosis—A Neglected Parasitic Disease of the Eye. J. Parasitol. 2006, 92, 872–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Otranto, D.; Ferroglio, E.; Lia, R.P.; Traversa, D.; Rossi, L. Current status and epidemiological observation of Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in dogs, cats and foxes in Italy: A “coincidence” or a parasitic disease of the Old Continent? Vet. Parasitol. 2003, 116, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dorchies, P.; Chaudieu, G.; Siméon, L.; Cazalot, G.; Cantacessi, C.; Otranto, D. First reports of autochthonous eyeworm infection by Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in dogs and cat from France. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 149, 294–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miró, G.; Montoya, A.; Hernández, L.; Dado, D.; Vázquez, M.V.; Benito, M.; Villagrasa, M.; Brianti, E.; Otranto, D. Thelazia callipaeda: Infection in dogs: A new parasite for Spain. Parasites Vectors 2011, 4, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Caron, Y.; Premont, J.; Losson, B.; Grauwels, M. Thelazia callipaeda ocular infection in two dogs in Belgium. J. Small Anim. Pr. 2012, 54, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Motta, B.; Nägeli, F.; Nägeli, C.; Solari-Basano, F.; Schiessl, B.; Deplazes, P.; Schnyder, M. Epidemiology of the eye worm Thelazia callipaeda in cats from southern Switzerland. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 203, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sargo, R.; Loureiro, F.; Catarino, A.L.; Valente, J.; Silva, F.; Cardoso, L.; Otranto, D.; Maia, C. First Report of Thelazia Callipaeda in Red Foxes (Vulpes Vulpes) From Portugal. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2014, 45, 458–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ioniţă, M.; Mitrea, I.L.; Ionică, A.M.; Morariu, S.; Mihalca, A.D. New Cases of Thelazia callipaeda Haplotype 1 in Dogs Suggest a Wider Distribution in Romania. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016, 16, 172–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Graham-Brown, J.; Gilmore, P.; Colella, V.; Moss, L.; Dixon, C.; Andrews, M.; Arbeid, P.; Barber, J.; Timofte, D.; McGarry, J.; et al. Three cases of imported eyeworm infection in dogs: A new threat for the United Kingdom. Vet. Rec. 2017, 181, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Papadopoulos, E.; Komnenou, A.; Thomas, A.; Ioannidou, E.; Colella, V.; Otranto, D. Spreading of Thelazia callipaeda in Greece. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 65, 248–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Farkas, R.; Takács, N.; Gyurkovszky, M.; Henszelmann, N.; Kisgergely, J.; Balka, G.; Solymosi, N.; Vass, A. The first feline and new canine cases of Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida: Thelaziidae) infection in Hungary. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hodžić, A.; Payer, A.; Duscher, G.G. The first autochthonous case of feline ocular thelaziosis in Austria. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 1321–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Spoerel, S.; Wiesner, L.; Klein, M.; Pantchev, N.; Taubert, A.; Hermosilla, C. Ophthalmic Thelazia callipaeda infections: First feline and new canine imported cases in Germany. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 3099–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, S.N.; Xu, F.F.; Chen, W.Q.; Jiang, P.; Cui, J.; Wang, Z.Q.; Zhang, X. A Case of Human Thelaziasis and Review of Chinese Cases. Acta Parasitol. 2020, 65, 783–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Otranto, D.; Cantacessi, C.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Brianti, E.; Pfeffer, M.; Genchi, C.; Guberti, V.; Capelli, G.; Deplazes, P. The role of wild canids and felids in spreading parasites to dogs and cats in Europe. Part II: Helminths and arthropods. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 213, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hughes, J.; Macdonald, D.W. A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 157, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Otranto, D.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Mihalca, A.D.; Traub, R.J.; Lappin, M.; Baneth, G. Zoonotic Parasites of Sheltered and Stray Dogs in the Era of the Global Economic and Political Crisis. Trends Parasitol. 2017, 33, 813–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jin, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wei, J.; Wen, Y.; He, N.; Tang, L.; Lin, D.; Lin, J. A first report of Thelazia callipaeda infection in Phortica okadai and wildlife in national nature reserves in China. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ruytoor, P.; Déan, E.; Pennant, O.; Dorchies, P.; Chermette, R.; Otranto, D.; Guillot, J. Ocular Thelaziosis in Dogs, France. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 1943–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Otranto, D.; Dantas-Torres, F. Transmission of the eyeworm Thelazia callipaeda: Between fantasy and reality. Parasites Vectors 2015, 8, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Otranto, D.; Colella, V.; Crescenzo, G.; Basano, F.S.; Nazzari, R.; Capelli, G.; Petry, G.; Schaper, R.; Pollmeier, M.; Mallia, E.; et al. Efficacy of moxidectin 2.5% and imidacloprid 10% in the treatment of ocular thelaziosis by Thelazia callipaeda in naturally infected dogs. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 227, 118–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Otranto, D.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Brianti, E.; Traversa, D.; Petrić, D.; Genchi, C.; Capelli, G. Vector-borne helminths of dogs and humans in Europe. Parasites Vectors 2013, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Otranto, D.; Lia, R.P.; Traversa, D.; Giannetto, S. Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) of carnivores and humans: Morphological study by light and scanning electron microscopy. Parassitologia 2003, 45, 125–133. [Google Scholar]
  28. Otranto, D.; Testini, G.; De Luca, F.; Hu, M.; Shamsi, S.; Gasser, R. Analysis of genetic variability within Thelazia callipaeda (Nematoda: Thelazioidea) from Europe and Asia by sequencing and mutation scanning of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene. Mol. Cell. Probes 2005, 19, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Barbosa, D.S.; Belo, V.S.; Bezerra, J.M.T.; Figueiredo, F.B.; Werneck, G.L. Factors associated with Leishmania infantum infection in dogs from urban areas endemic for visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil. Res. Vet. Sci. 2022, 152, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Maia, C.; Catarino, A.L.; Almeida, B.; Ramos, C.; Campino, L.; Cardoso, L. Emergence of Thelazia callipaeda Infection in Dogs and Cats from East-Central Portugal. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2014, 63, 416–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marino, V.; Gálvez, R.; Colella, V.; Sarquis, J.; Checa, R.; Montoya, A.; Barrera, J.P.; Domínguez, S.; Lia, R.P.; Otranto, D.; et al. Detection of Thelazia callipaeda in Phortica variegata and spread of canine thelaziosis to new areas in Spain. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Seo, M.; Yu, J.-R.; Park, H.-Y.; Huh, S.; Kim, S.-K.; Hong, S.-T. Enzooticity of the dogs, the reservoir host of Thelazia callipaeda, in Korea. Korean J. Parasitol. 2002, 40, 101–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Otranto, D.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Mallia, E.; DiGeronimo, P.M.; Brianti, E.; Testini, G.; Traversa, D.; Lia, R.P. Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in wild animals: Report of new host species and ecological implications. Veter- Parasitol. 2009, 166, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pombi, M.; Marino, V.; Jaenike, J.; Graham-Brown, J.; Bernardini, I.; Lia, R.P.; Beugnet, F.; Miro, G.; Otranto, D. Temperature is a common climatic descriptor of lachryphagous activity period in Phortica variegata (Diptera: Drosophilidae) from multiple geographical locations. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Otranto, D.; Lia, R.P.; Buono, V.; Traversa, D.; Giangaspero, A. Biology of Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) eyeworms in naturally infected definitive hosts. Parasitology 2004, 129, 627–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bianciardi, P.; Otranto, D. Treatment of dog thelaziosis caused by Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) using a topical formulation of imidacloprid 10% and moxidectin 2.5%. Vet. Parasitol. 2005, 129, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Motta, B.; Schnyder, M.; Basano, F.S.; Nägeli, F.; Nägeli, C.; Schiessl, B.; Mallia, E.; Lia, R.P.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Otranto, D. Therapeutic efficacy of milbemycin oxime/praziquantel oral formulation (Milbemax®) against Thelazia callipaeda in naturally infested dogs and cats. Parasites Vectors 2012, 5, 85–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hodžić, A.; Latrofa, M.S.; Annoscia, G.; Alić, A.; Beck, R.; Lia, R.P.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Otranto, D. The spread of zoonotic Thelazia callipaeda in the Balkan area. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 13 00166 g001
Figure 1. (A) T. callipaeda in the ocular conjunctival sac of a domestic dog. (B) Image of T. callipaeda showing the buccal capsule, pharynx, esophagus, cuticle striations, and vulva at the anterior end of a T. callipaeda female (arrow). (C) Larvae in a T. callipaeda female uterus (arrow). (D) The spicule at the posterior end of a T. callipaeda male (arrow).
Figure 1. (A) T. callipaeda in the ocular conjunctival sac of a domestic dog. (B) Image of T. callipaeda showing the buccal capsule, pharynx, esophagus, cuticle striations, and vulva at the anterior end of a T. callipaeda female (arrow). (C) Larvae in a T. callipaeda female uterus (arrow). (D) The spicule at the posterior end of a T. callipaeda male (arrow).
Pathogens 13 00166 g001
Pathogens 13 00166 g002
Figure 2. Prevalence and geographical location of domestic dog thelaziosis in mountainous areas and plain areas of Beijing from 2018 to 2019. DC: Dongcheng District, XC: Xicheng District, CY: Chaoyang District, HD: Haidian District, FT: Fengtai District, SJS: Shijingshan District, CP: Changping District, DX: Daxing District, FS: Fangshan District, MTG: Mentougou District, MY: Miyun District, PG: Pinggu District, SY: Shunyi District, TZ: TongZhou District, YQ: Yanqing District, and HR: Huairou District. Maps were created using ArcGIS 10.8.
Figure 2. Prevalence and geographical location of domestic dog thelaziosis in mountainous areas and plain areas of Beijing from 2018 to 2019. DC: Dongcheng District, XC: Xicheng District, CY: Chaoyang District, HD: Haidian District, FT: Fengtai District, SJS: Shijingshan District, CP: Changping District, DX: Daxing District, FS: Fangshan District, MTG: Mentougou District, MY: Miyun District, PG: Pinggu District, SY: Shunyi District, TZ: TongZhou District, YQ: Yanqing District, and HR: Huairou District. Maps were created using ArcGIS 10.8.
Pathogens 13 00166 g002
Table 1. Risk factors and prevalence of thelaziosis infection in domestic dogs from Beijing in 2018–2019.
Table 1. Risk factors and prevalence of thelaziosis infection in domestic dogs from Beijing in 2018–2019.
Risk FactorsFrequencyPrevalence95% CIχ2 (df)p-Value
RegionPlain area57/21812.61%1.94–3.28%6.902 (1)0.009
Mountainous area45/10344.35%3.11–5.60%
SeasonSpring15/7801.92%0.96–2.89%14.887 (3)0.002
Summer40/9364.27%2.98–5.57%
Autumn35/8274.23%2.86–5.60%
Winter12/6721.79%0.78–2.79%
Age≤7Y66/15924.15%3.17–5.12%2.241 (1)0.134
>7Y36/11763.06%2.08–4.05%
SexMale59/18213.24%2.43–4.05%0.062 (1)0.803
Female43/13943.08%2.18–3.99%
BreedPure breed88/27533.20%2.54–3.85%0.036 (1)0.850
Half breed14/4623.03%1.47–4.59%
SizeSmall25/6593.79%2.34–5.25%1.856 (3)0.603
Medium27/8363.23%2.03–4.43%
Large41/14792.77%1.94–3.61%
Giant9/2413.73%1.34–6.13%
Living environmentHouse67/22892.93%2.24–3.62%3.530 (2)0.171
Kennel12/4162.88%1.28–4.49%
Free range23/5104.51%2.71–6.31%
DietCommercial food80/26073.07%2.41–3.73%0.485 (1)0.486
Self-made food22/6083.62%2.13–5.10%
Country park travel historyYes16/3095.18%2.71–7.65%4.475 (1)0.034
No86/29062.96%2.34–3.58%
Immunization historyYes65/21693.00%2.28–3.71%0.671 (1)0.413
No37/10463.54%2.42–4.66%
Anthelmintic treatment historyYes56/21382.62%1.94–3.30%6.362 (1)0.012
No46/10774.27%3.06–5.48%
Total102/32153.17%2.57–3.78%--
Frequency: thelaziosis cases/ophthalmic cases, CI: confidence interval, df: degree of freedom, spring: March to May, summer: June to August, autumn: September to November, and winter: December to February.
Table 2. Analysis of risk factors influencing the prevalence of domestic dog thelaziosis in summer and autumn.
Table 2. Analysis of risk factors influencing the prevalence of domestic dog thelaziosis in summer and autumn.
Risk FactorsOR95% CIp-Value
Region4.1641.023–19.4370.023
Country park travel history2.3821.039–28.8310.015
Anthelmintic treatment history1.4381.009–2.2430.022
OR: Odds Ratio and CI: confidence interval.
Table 3. Correlation between ocular clinical symptoms and Thelazia callipaeda carrying capacity.
Table 3. Correlation between ocular clinical symptoms and Thelazia callipaeda carrying capacity.
Ocular Clinical SymptomsNumber of Monocular T. callipaeda
1–1011–20>20
Prevalence
Asymptomatic6.31% (7/111)8.57% (3/35)5.56% (1/18)
Mild36.94% (41/111)14.29% (5/35)5.56% (1/18)
Moderate47.75% (53/111)62.86% (22/35)66.67% (12/18)
Severe9.00% (10/111)14.29% (5/35)22.22% (4/18)
Mild symptoms: increased ocular secretion and purulent secretion, moderate symptoms: increased ocular secretion and purulent secretion with conjunctivitis, and severe symptoms: keratitis and corneal ulcer.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Z.; Yu, C.; Tan, X.; Chen, N.; Jin, Y. Epidemiology of Ocular Thelaziosis in Domestic Dogs in Beijing. Pathogens 2024, 13, 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13020166

AMA Style

Liu Z, Yu C, Tan X, Chen N, Jin Y. Epidemiology of Ocular Thelaziosis in Domestic Dogs in Beijing. Pathogens. 2024; 13(2):166. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13020166

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Zichen, Chang Yu, Xiaoli Tan, Ni Chen, and Yipeng Jin. 2024. "Epidemiology of Ocular Thelaziosis in Domestic Dogs in Beijing" Pathogens 13, no. 2: 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13020166

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop