Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Porcine Zoonotic Bacterial Pathogens in India: A 13-Year (2010–2023) Study
-
Published:2023-10-21
Issue:10
Volume:12
Page:1266
-
ISSN:2076-0817
-
Container-title:Pathogens
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Pathogens
Author:
Rajkhowa Swaraj1, Sonowal Joyshikh1ORCID, Borthakur Udipta2, Pegu Seema Rani1, Deb Rajib1ORCID, Das Pranab Jyoti1, Sengar Gyanendra Singh1, Gupta Vivek Kumar1
Affiliation:
1. ICAR-National Research Centre on Pig, Rani, Guwahati 781131, Assam, India 2. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Department, Guwahati 781003, Assam, India
Abstract
The presence of bacterial pathogens such as Brucella spp., Clostridium spp., E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus spp., and Streptococcus suis not only hampers pig production but also carries significant zoonotic implications. The present study aims to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning over 13 years (2010–2023) to ascertain the prevalence of these zoonotic bacterial pathogens in Indian pig populations. The study seeks to synthesize data from diverse geographic regions within India and underscores the relevance of the One Health framework. A systematic search of electronic databases was meticulously performed. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies detailing zoonotic bacterial pathogen prevalence in pigs within India during the specified timeframe. Pertinent information including authors, publication year, geographical location, sampling techniques, sample sizes, and pathogen-positive case counts were meticulously extracted. The meta-analysis of zoonotic bacterial pathogens in Indian pig populations (2010–2023) unveiled varying prevalence rates: 9% Brucella spp., 22% Clostridium spp., 19% E. coli, 12% Listeria monocytogenes, 10% Salmonella spp. and Streptococcus suis, and 24% Staphylococcus spp. The application of random effects further revealed additional variability: 6% Brucella spp., 23% Clostridium spp., 24% E. coli, 14% Listeria monocytogenes, 10% Salmonella spp. and Streptococcus suis, and 35% Staphylococcus spp. Notably, the observed heterogeneity (I2) varied significantly from 87% to 99%. The meta-analysis findings underscore the pervasive nature of these diseases throughout India’s pig populations, accentuating the substantial impact of these pathogens on pig health and the potential for zoonotic transmission. The present study reinforces the importance of the adoption of a comprehensive One Health approach that acknowledges the intricate interplay between animal, human and environmental health.
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),General Immunology and Microbiology,Molecular Biology,Immunology and Allergy
Reference99 articles.
1. Uzal, F.A., Navarro, M.A., Asin, J., Boix, O., Ballarà-Rodriguez, I., and Gibert, X. (2023). Clostridial diarrheas in piglets: A review. Vet. Microbiol., 280. 2. Di Bella, S., Ascenzi, P., Siarakas, S., Petrosillo, N., and di Masi, A. (2016). Clostridium difficile Toxins A and B: Insights into Pathogenic Properties and Extraintestinal Effects. Toxins, 8. 3. Pacheco, A.R., and Sperandio, V. (2012). Shiga toxin in enterohemorrhagic E.coli: Regulation and novel anti-virulence strategies. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 2. 4. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: An update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection;Castanheira;JAC-Antimicrob. Resist.,2021 5. Bergšpica, I., Kaprou, G., Alexa, E.A., Prieto, M., and Alvarez-Ordóñez, A. (2020). Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) Producing Escherichia coli in Pigs and Pork Meat in the European Union. Antibiotics, 9.
|
|