Efficiency of Transport Infrastructure in Asian Russia, China, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan in the Context of Creating New Trans-Eurasian Transport Corridors
-
Published:2023-06-18
Issue:12
Volume:15
Page:9714
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Rygzynov Tumun Sh.1, Batomunkuev Valentin S.1ORCID, Gomboev Bair O.1, Dong Suocheng23, Sharaldaev Bayanzhargal B.1, Ayusheeva Valentina G.1, Badmaev Aldar G.1ORCID, Motoshkina Marina A.1, Zangeeva Natalya R.1ORCID, Tsybikova Aryuna B.1, Tsydypov Vitaly E.1, Zhamyanov Daba Ts.-D.1, Banzaraktcaev Zorikto E.1, Alekseev Aleksei V.1, Popov Dmitry V.1ORCID, Bazarzhapov Tcogto Zh.123ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Baikal Institute of Nature Management, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 670047 Ulan-Ude, Russia 2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract
This article discusses the efficiency of transport infrastructure and cooperation of neighboring regions located in Asian Russia, China, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan in the context of creating new international economic corridors from the Silk Road and trans-Eurasian transport corridors. This study aims to highlight the possible ways of strengthening cross-border cooperation in the field of transport infrastructure. We evaluated the current state of the transport infrastructure, the dynamics of its development, and its influence on the territorial–production complex. Using quantitative data and the unified indicator for the efficiency of transport infrastructure, we also characterized the territorial differentiation, its causes, and prerequisites for further economic and trade cooperation between these countries. The main results are as follows: (1) The lowest levels of the efficiency of transport infrastructure are typical for the northeast of Asian Russia, as well as for the border regions of China, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan. (2) For Asian Russia, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia, the highest levels of the unified indicator are typical for regions located along the main transport routes and for regions with a developed mining industry. This is due to the strong unevenness of the socio-economic development of the territories. (3) The largest industrial and economic centers have been developing along the main transport corridors primarily due to the accumulated potential of equivalent freight turnover and export potential. This study can be useful for authorities and business, as well as for other users of transport infrastructure to improve its regulation and efficiency.
Funder
Baikal Institute of Nature Management, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference56 articles.
1. Infrastructure as a factor of economic growth;Kondratyev;Russ. J. Entrep.,2010 2. Kayuchkin, N.P. (2003). Geographical Principles of Transport Development of a Territory, Nauka. 3. Baklanov, P.Y. (2008). Border Areas: Problems of Sustainable Nature Management, Dalnauka. 4. International transport corridors of Eurasia and the Silk Road Economic Belt;Asaul;Eurasian Integr. Econ. Law Politics,2019 5. EEU countries in the context of joining the initiative of China “One Belt-One Way”;Selishceva;Probl. Today’s Econ.,2020
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|