Biocompatibility and Biological Performance of Additive-Manufactured Bioabsorbable Iron-Based Porous Interference Screws in a Rabbit Model: A 1-Year Observational Study
-
Published:2022-11-23
Issue:23
Volume:23
Page:14626
-
ISSN:1422-0067
-
Container-title:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJMS
Author:
Tai Chien-Cheng, Huang Yu-MinORCID, Liaw Chen-Kun, Yang Kuo-Yi, Ma Chun-Hsien, Huang Shin-I, Huang Chih-Chieh, Tsai Pei-IORCID, Shen Hsin-Hsin, Sun Jui-ShengORCID, Chen Chih-YuORCID
Abstract
This study evaluated the mid-term (12-month) biomechanical, biocompatibility, and biological performance of additive-manufactured bioabsorbable iron-based interference screws (ISs). Two bioabsorbable iron IS types—manufactured using pure iron powder (iron_IS) and using pure iron powder with 0.2 wt% tricalcium phosphate (TCP_IS)—were compared with conventional metallic IS (control) using in vitro biocompatibility and degradation analyses and an in vivo animal study. The in vitro ultimate failure strength was significantly higher for iron_IS and TCP_IS than for control ISs at 3 months post-operatively; however, the difference between groups were nonsignificant thereafter. Moreover, at 3 months after implantation, iron_IS and TCP_IS increased bone volume fraction, bone surface area fraction, and percent intersection surface; the changes thereafter were nonsignificant. Iron_IS and TCP_IS demonstrated degradation over time with increased implant surface, decreased implant volume, and structure thickness; nevertheless, the analyses of visceral organs and biochemistry demonstrated normal results, except for time-dependent iron deposition in the spleen. Therefore, compared with conventional ISs, bioabsorbable iron-based ISs exhibit higher initial mechanical strength. Although iron-based ISs demonstrate high biocompatibility 12 months after implantation, their corrosive iron products may accumulate in the spleen. Because they demonstrate mechanical superiority along with considerable absorption capability after implantation, iron-based ISs may have potential applications in implantable medical-device development in the future.
Funder
Industrial Technology Research Institute Taipei Medical University–Shuang Ho Hospital
Subject
Inorganic Chemistry,Organic Chemistry,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Computer Science Applications,Spectroscopy,Molecular Biology,General Medicine,Catalysis
Reference36 articles.
1. Santos, C., Alves, M., Montemor, M.F., and Carmezim, M.J. (2017). Bioresorbable metallic implants: Surface functionalization with nanoparticles and nanostructures. Adv. Mater. Appl. Micro Nano Scale, 219–242. 2. Park, J.B., and Bronzino, J.D. (2002). Biomaterials: Principles and Applications, Taylor & Francis. 3. Salama, M., Vaz, M.F., Colaço, R., Santos, C., and Carmezim, M. (2022). Biodegradable Iron and Porous Iron: Mechanical Properties, Degradation Behaviour, Manufacturing Routes and Biomedical Applications. J. Funct. Biomater., 13. 4. Current status and outlook on the clinical translation of biodegradable metals;Mater. Today,2019 5. Biodegradable metallic bone implants;Mater. Chem. Front.,2019
|
|