Exploring the Spatial Autocorrelation in Soil Moisture Networks: Analysis of the Bias from Upscaling the Texas Soil Observation Network (TxSON)

Author:

Xu YapingORCID,Liu Cuiling,Wang LeiORCID,Zou LeiORCID

Abstract

Microwave remote sensing such as soil moisture active passive (SMAP) can provide soil moisture data for agricultural and hydrological studies. However, the scales between station-measured and satellite-measured products are quite different, as stations measure on a point scale while satellites have a much larger footprint (e.g., 9 km). Consequently, the validation for soil moisture products, especially inter-comparison between these two types of observations, is quite a challenge. Spatial autocorrelation among the stations could be a contribution of bias, which impacts the dense soil moisture networks when compared with satellite soil moisture products. To examine the effects of spatial autocorrelation to soil moisture upscaling models, this study proposes a spatial analysis approach for soil moisture ground observation upscaling and Thiessen polygon-based block kriging (TBP kriging) and compares the results with three other methods typically used in the current literature: arithmetic average, Thiessen polygon, and Gaussian-weighted average. Using the Texas Soil Observation Network (TxSON) as ground observation, this methodology detects spatial autocorrelation in the distribution of the stations that exist in dense soil moisture networks and improved the spatial modeling accuracy when carrying out upscaling tasks. The study concluded that through TBP kriging the minimum root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) is given where spatial autocorrelation takes place in the soil moisture stations. Through TBP kriging, the station-measured and satellite-measured soil moisture products are more comparable.

Funder

Louisiana State University Dissertation Fellowship

Southern Regional Climate Center

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3