Apatite U-Pb Thermochronology: A Review

Abstract

The temperature sensitivity of the U-Pb apatite system (350–570 °C) makes it a powerful tool to study thermal histories in the deeper crust. Recent studies have exploited diffusive Pb loss from apatite crystals to generate t-T paths between ~350–570 °C, by comparing apatite U-Pb ID-TIMS (isotope dilution-thermal ionisation mass spectrometry) dates with grain size or by LA-MC-ICP-MS (laser ablation-multicollector-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry) age depth profiling/traverses of apatite crystals, and assuming the effective diffusion domain is the entire crystal. The key assumptions of apatite U-Pb thermochronology are discussed including (i) that Pb has been lost by Fickian diffusion, (ii) can experimental apatite Pb diffusion parameters be extrapolated down temperature to geological settings and (iii) are apatite grain boundaries open (i.e., is Pb lost to an infinite reservoir). Particular emphasis is placed on detecting fluid-mediated remobilisation of Pb, which invalidates assumption (i). The highly diverse and rock-type specific nature of apatite trace-element chemistry is very useful in this regard—metasomatic and low-grade metamorphic apatite can be easily distinguished from sub-categories of igneous rocks and high-grade metamorphic apatite. This enables reprecipitated domains to be identified geochemically and linked with petrographic observations. Other challenges in apatite U-Pb thermochronology are also discussed. An appropriate choice of initial Pb composition is critical, while U zoning remains an issue for inverse modelling of single crystal ID-TIMS dates, and LA-ICP-MS age traverses need to be integrated with U zoning information. A recommended apatite U-Pb thermochronology protocol for LA-MC-ICP-MS age depth profiling/traverses of apatite crystals and linked to petrographic and trace element information is presented.