“What about Military Decision-Making?”: A Bibliometric Review of Published Articles

Author:

D’Alessio Ivan1ORCID,Aitella Umberto1ORCID,Giannini Anna Maria1ORCID,Burrai Jessica1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy

Abstract

Decision-making processes in the military domain constitute a strategic field of research in cognitive psychology, although there are currently few scientific publications addressing the topic. Professionals in the field and interested parties need access to data on military decision-making processes to understand where and how the scientific community is directing its investigations on the issue. Military decision-making is a strategic field of study because the military is crucial to the security and defense of a country or community. This work aims to be a point of reference for those involved in various capacities in military decision-making, providing key data regarding research trends over the years, the geographical distribution of scientific productivity, methodologies employed, annual statistics, and the prevalence of the most-investigated terms and topics. Therefore, this study serves as a bibliometric analysis of the literature on military decision-making publihed from 1992 to 2023 on the Scopus and Web of Science databases.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference63 articles.

1. D’alessio, I., Quaglieri, A., Burrai, J., Pizzo, A., Mari, E., Aitella, U., Lausi, G., Tagliaferri, G., Cordellieri, P., and Giannini, A.M. (2024). “Leading through Crisis”: A Systematic Review of Institutional Decision-Makers in Emergency Contexts. Behav. Sci., 14.

2. Guitouni, A., Wheaton, K., and Wood, D. (2006, January 26–28). An Essay to Characterise Models of the Military Decision-Making Process. Proceedings of the 11th ICCRT Symposium, Cambridge, UK.

3. Moderato, P., and Rovetto, F. (2015). Psicologo: Verso la Professione, McGraw-Hill.

4. Janis, I.L., and Mann, L. (1977). Decision Making: A psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment, Free Press.

5. Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. (2007). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior: 60th Anniversary Commemorative Edition. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3