Affiliation:
1. School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
Abstract
This study uses polynomial regression and response surface analyses to investigate the joint effects of agentic and communal goals on bullying and the moderating role of prosocial strategies. The sample included 917 adolescents (Mage = 13.54, SD = 1.02) from rural, suburban, and urban areas in China. The findings revealed that higher agentic and lower communal goals were associated with a linear rise in bullying. Surprisingly, when both social goals were higher simultaneously, bullying followed an inverted U-shaped pattern. Furthermore, prosocial strategies moderated the joint effects of the two social goals. Adolescents who are more likely to use prosocial strategies do not show significant changes in bullying when both goals are at a higher level. In contrast, those who are less likely to do so show a linear rise in bullying, regardless of changes in social goals. This study improves our understanding and intervention of bullying behavior, emphasizing a non-pathological perspective.
Reference63 articles.
1. UNESCO (2019). Behind the Numbers: Ending School Violence and Bullying, UNESCO.
2. Bullying Behaviors Among US Youth: Prevalence and Association With Psychosocial Adjustment;Nansel;JAMA,2001
3. Hawley, P.H., Stump, K.N., and Ratliff, J. (2010). Sidestepping the Jingle Fallacy: Bullying, Aggression, and the Importance of Knowing the Diff Erence. Bullying in North American Schools, Routledge.
4. Social Goals and Gains of Adolescent Bullying and Aggression: A Meta-Analysis;Hensums;Dev. Rev.,2023
5. Bullying as Strategic Behavior: Relations with Desired and Acquired Dominance in the Peer Group;Olthof;J. Sch. Psychol.,2011