Genetically Determined Differences in Annual Shoot Elongation of Young Norway Spruce

Abstract

The annual shoot elongation could be described by a non-linear growth model to characterize differences in its dynamics among spruce genotypes, the effect of each shoot elongation phase on the total shoot length, and the genetic differences for a particular growth phase. The terminal shoot length was measured in two open-pollinated progeny trials of Norway spruce on average once per week during the ninth growing season. For the analysis, 10% of families with the longest annual increment (shoot) and 10% with the shortest were selected for each trial. The Gompertz model was fitted to individual tree data, and the mean values of its coefficients for each group of families were obtained. Family significantly (p < 0.001) affected total shoot length and all growth rhythm parameters, with similar trends reported in both studied sites. Heritability of Gompertz model coefficients in most cases exceeded that of the tree height. The superior10% of families started shoot elongation slightly but non-significantly earlier (all p > 0.05) than the other groups of families and had more intense shoot elongation (mm per day) during the entire growing season. A strong negative relation was found between the slope coefficient of the cumulative shoot elongation lines and the total height increment. The group of families with the longest increment had flatter relative shoot elongation lines, indicating relatively more evenly distributed growth within the growing season. In contrast, families with the shortest increment tended to accumulate a higher proportion of height increment during the active growth phase and reduced relative growth intensity more rapidly. The 10% of families with the largest annual increment showed superior characteristics in all shoot elongation phases, resulting in 30–40% longer shoots compared to the 10% of families with the smallest annual increment. The significant differences in Gompertz model coefficients indicate that genotypes with favorable growth patterns might be selected.