Author:
Larochelle Tommee,Noble Aaron,Strickland Kris,Ahn Allie,Ziemkiewicz Paul,Constant James,Hoffman David,Glascock Caitlin
Abstract
Acid mine drainage is a legacy environmental issue and one of the largest pollutants in many mining districts throughout the world. In prior work, the authors have developed a process for the recovery of critical materials, including the rare earth elements, from acid mine drainage using a preconcentration step followed by solvent extraction as a concentration and purification technology. As part of the downstream technology development efforts, we have synthesized a suite of ionic liquid extractants that facilitate greater separation factors leading to lower capital costs and reduced environmental impacts. This article provides a comparison of the conventional extractants D2EHPA, EHEHPA and C572 with their respective ionic liquids [c101][D2EHP,c101][EHEHP] and [c101][C572] for the recovery of rare earth elements from acid mine drainage. In the study, laboratory-scale, multi-contact solvent extraction tests were conducted at high and low extractant/dosages. The results show that the ionic liquids varied in performance, with [c101][D2EHP] and [c101][EHEHP] performing poorer than their conventional counterparts and [c101][c572] performing better. Recommendations for further study on [c101][c572] include stripping tests, continuous pilot testing, and techno-economic analysis.
Funder
United States Department of Energy
Subject
Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference40 articles.
1. Critical Materials Strategy;U.S. Department of Energy,2011
2. Critical Minerals and Materials;U.S. Department of Energy,2021
3. The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions,2021
4. Critical minerals in Australia: a review of opportunities and research needs
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献