Validating Digital Earth Australia NBART for the Landsat 9 Underfly of Landsat 8

Author:

Byrne Guy1ORCID,Broomhall Mark1ORCID,Walsh Andrew J.1ORCID,Thankappan Medhavy1ORCID,Hay Eric1,Li Fuqin1,McAtee Brendon2,Garcia Rodrigo3ORCID,Anstee Janet4ORCID,Kerrisk Gemma5ORCID,Drayson Nathan5ORCID,Barnetson Jason6ORCID,Samford Ian6,Denham Robert7

Affiliation:

1. Geoscience Australia, Cnr Jerrabomberra Ave. and Hindmarsh Drive, Symonston, ACT 2609, Australia

2. Remote Sensing and Satellite Research Group, School of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia

3. School of Earth Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia

4. AquaWatch Australia CSIRO Space and Astronomy, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

5. CSIRO Environment, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

6. Queensland Department of Environment and Science, GPO Box 2454, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia

7. School of the Environment, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia

Abstract

In recent years, Geoscience Australia has undertaken a successful continental-scale validation program, targeting Landsat and Sentinel analysis-ready data surface reflectance products. The field validation model used for this program was successfully built upon earlier studies, and the measurement uncertainties associated with these protocols have been quantified and published. As a consequence, the Australian earth observation community was well-prepared to respond to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) call for collaborators with the 2021 Landsat 8 (L8) and Landsat 9 (L9) underfly. Despite a number of challenges, seven validation datasets were captured across five sites. As there was only a single 100% overlap transit across Australia, and the country was amidst a strong La Niña climate cycle, it was decided to deploy teams to the two available overpasses with only 15% side lap. The validation sites encompassed rangelands, chenopod shrublands, and a large inland lake. Apart from instrument problems at one site, good weather enabled the capture of high-quality field data allowing for meaningful comparisons between the radiometric performance of L8 and L9, as well as the USGS and Australian Landsat analysis-ready data processing models. Duplicate (cross-calibration) spectral sampling at different sites provides evidence of the field protocol reliability, while the off-nadir view of L9 over the water site has been used to better compare the performance of different water and atmospheric correction processing models.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference58 articles.

1. Validation Practices for Satellite-Based Earth Observation Data across Communities;Loew;Rev. Geophys.,2017

2. (2024, February 18). A Quality Assurance Framework for Earth Observation: Implementation Strategy and Work Plan. Available online: https://www.qa4eo.org/docs/QA4EO_Principles_v4.0.pdf.

3. (2024, February 18). A Guide to Comparisons—Organisation, Operation and Analysis to Establish Measurement Equivalence to Underpin the Quality Assurance Requirements of GEO. Available online: https://www.qa4eo.org/docs/QA4EO-QAEO-GEN-DQK-004_v4.0.pdf.

4. Fifty Years of Landsat Science and Impacts;Wulder;Remote Sens. Environ.,2001

5. Landsat: Building a Strong Future;Lovel;Remote Sens. Environ.,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3