Experimental Comparison of Methods to Evaluate Heat Generated by Magnetic Nanofluids Exposed to Alternating Magnetic Fields

Author:

Sieni Elisabetta1ORCID,Geninatti Crich Simonetta2ORCID,Ruggiero Maria Rosaria2ORCID,Del Bianco Lucia3ORCID,Spizzo Federico3ORCID,Bertani Roberta4ORCID,Mozzon Mirto4,Barozzi Marco5,Forzan Michele4ORCID,Sgarbossa Paolo4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy

2. Department of Molecular Biotechnologies and Health Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy

3. Department of Physics and Earth Science, University of Ferrara, 44122 Ferrara, Italy

4. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy

5. Department of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy

Abstract

The paper aims to compare different methods able to estimate the specific loss power (SLP) generated by three different types of magnetic nanoparticles, MNPs, dispersed in a suspension fluid, e.g., octane or water. The nanoparticles were characterized morphologically in terms of shape and size, chemically for composition and their physical properties like magnetization and SLP were studied. We evidenced the differences in SLP evaluation due to the applied method, particularly in the presence of thermally induced phenomena such as aggregation or precipitation of MNPs that can affect the heating curve of the samples. Then, the SLP determination methods less sensible to this phenomenon appear to be the ones that use the initial slope when the sample is in quasi-adiabatic condition. Finally, we propose a comparison of those methods based on the pros and cons of their use for the SLP determination of magnetic nanofluids. In particular, the analysis of the behavior of the heating curve is useful to evaluate the useful amplitude of the interval analysis for the initial slope methods.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Mechanical Engineering,Condensed Matter Physics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3