Effect of an Alliaceae Encapsulated Extract on Growth Performance, Gut Health, and Intestinal Microbiota in Broiler Chickens Challenged with Eimeria spp.
Author:
Villar-Patiño Gonzalo12ORCID, Camacho-Rea María del Carmen3, Olvera-García Myrna Elena2, Baltazar-Vázquez Julio César4, Gómez-Verduzco Gabriela5, Téllez Guillermo6ORCID, Labastida Aurora7, Ramírez-Pérez Aurora Hilda5ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias de la Salud y de la Producción Animal, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 3000, Coyoacán, Ciudad de Mexico 04510, Mexico 2. Grupo Nutec, Avenida de las Fuentes No. 14, Parque Industrial Bernardo Quintana, El Marqués 76246, Querétaro, Mexico 3. Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Departamento de Nutrición Animal, Tlalpan, Ciudad de Mexico 14080, Mexico 4. Specialized Animal Nutrition Research Network, Grupo Nutec, La Valla, San Juan del Río 76814, Querétaro, Mexico 5. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 3000, Coyoacán, Ciudad de Mexico 04510, Mexico 6. Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA 7. OMICs Analysis, Camino a Xilotepetl No. 45, Tepoztlán 62520, Morelos, Mexico
Abstract
This study analyzed the effects of an Alliaceae encapsulated extract (AE-e) on daily gain (ADG), feed intake (ADFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), oocysts per gram of feces (OPG), intestinal lesion (LS), and microbiota composition in broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. A total of 4800 one day Cobb-500 were allotted into 10 treatment groups with 12 replicates of 40 birds in a 2 × 4 + 2 factorial arrangement. The first factor was non-challenged (NC) or challenged (C), the second was four levels of AE-e added in the basal diet, 0 (AE0), 250 (AE250), 500 (AE500), and 750 mg·kg−1 (AE750), plus two ionophore controls, non-challenged (NC-Ion) and challenged (C-Ion). No interactions were observed between factors (NC0, NC250, NC500, NC750, C0, C250, C500, and C750), while C-Ion improved FCR at 21 d. The challenge affected negatively ADG and FCR and promoted enteropathogens in cecum. AE750 improved FCR in the finisher and cumulative phases, while C-Ion had fewer total OPG than C0 and C250. Likewise, at 21d, C250, C500, and C-Ion had fewer LS than C0, while at 28 d, C750 showed lower than C-Ion. In the cecum microbiota, C500 had more Ruminococcus, Firmicutes b, and Intestinimonas than C-Ion. In summary, AE-e showed beneficial results in broilers infected with Eimeria spp.
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference71 articles.
1. Britez, J.D., Rodriguez, A.E., Di Ciaccio, L., Marugán-Hernandez, V., and Tomazic, M.L. (2023). What do we know about surface proteins of chicken parasites Eimeria?. Life, 13. 2. Liu, J., Liu, L., Li, L., Tian, D., Li, W., Xu, L., Yan, R., Li, X., and Song, X. (2018). Protective immunity induced by Eimeria common antigen 14–3-3 against Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina and Eimeria maxima. BMC Vet. Res., 14. 3. Anticoccidial drugs of the livestock industry;Noack;Parasitol. Res.,2019 4. Vaccines against chicken coccidiosis with particular reference to previous decade: Progress, challenges, and opportunities;Zaheer;Parasitol. Res.,2022 5. Chicken coccidiosis: From the parasite lifecycle to control of the disease;Front. Vet. Sci.,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|