Identification and Quantification of Activities Common to Intensive Care Patients; Development and Validation of a Dual-Accelerometer-Based Algorithm

Author:

Dikkema Yvonne123ORCID,Mouton Noor3,Gerrits Koen3,Valk Tim4ORCID,van der Steen-Diepenrink Mariëlle5,Eshuis Hans6,Houdijk Han3ORCID,van der Schans Cees278,Niemeijer Anuschka1,Nieuwenhuis Marianne123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Association of Dutch Burn Centers, Burn Center Martini Hospital Groningen, 9728 NT Groningen, The Netherlands

2. Research Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Healthcare and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, 9714 CA Groningen, The Netherlands

3. Department of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands

4. Department of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands

5. Department of Intensive Care, Martini Hospital, 9728 NT Groningen, The Netherlands

6. Burn Center, Martini Hospital, 9728 NT Groningen, The Netherlands

7. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands

8. Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and validate an algorithm that can identify the type, frequency, and duration of activities common to intensive care (IC) patients. Ten healthy participants wore two accelerometers on their chest and leg while performing 14 activities clustered into four protocols (i.e., natural, strict, healthcare provider, and bed cycling). A video served as the reference standard, with two raters classifying the type and duration of all activities. This classification was reliable as intraclass correlations were all above 0.76 except for walking in the healthcare provider protocol, (0.29). The data of four participants were used to develop and optimize the algorithm by adjusting body-segment angles and rest-activity-threshold values based on percentage agreement (%Agr) with the reference. The validity of the algorithm was subsequently assessed using the data from the remaining six participants. %Agr of the algorithm versus the reference standard regarding lying, sitting activities, and transitions was 95%, 74%, and 80%, respectively, for all protocols except transitions with the help of a healthcare provider, which was 14–18%. For bed cycling, %Agr was 57–76%. This study demonstrated that the developed algorithm is suitable for identifying and quantifying activities common for intensive care patients. Knowledge on the (in)activity of these patients and their impact will optimize mobilization.

Funder

Dutch Burns Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3