Explain Breathlessness: Could ‘Usual’ Explanations Contribute to Maladaptive Beliefs of People Living with Breathlessness?

Abstract

Background: Explanations provided by healthcare professionals contribute to patient beliefs. Little is known about how healthcare professionals explain chronic breathlessness to people living with this adverse sensation. Methods: A purpose-designed survey disseminated via newsletters of Australian professional associations (physiotherapy, respiratory medicine, palliative care). Respondents provided free-text responses for their usual explanation and concepts important to include, avoid, or perceived as difficult to understand by recipients. Content analysis coded free text into mutually exclusive categories with the proportion of respondents in each category reported. Results: Respondents (n = 61) were predominantly clinicians (93%) who frequently (80% daily/weekly) conversed with patients about breathlessness. Frequent phrases included within usual explanations reflected breathlessness resulting from medical conditions (70% of respondents) and physiological mechanisms (44%) with foci ranging from multifactorial to single-mechanism origins. Management principles were important to include and phrases encouraging maladaptive beliefs were important to avoid. The most frequent difficult concept identified concerned inconsistent relationships between oxygenation and breathlessness. Where explanations included the term ’oxygen’, a form of cognitive shortcut (heuristic) may contribute to erroneous beliefs. Conclusions: This study presents examples of health professional explanations for chronic breathlessness as a starting point for considering whether and how explanations could contribute to adaptive or maladaptive breathlessness beliefs of recipients.