Affiliation:
1. Department of Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
2. Department of Service Design, Graduate School of Industrial Arts, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Republic of Korea
3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 21431, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Owing to long-term treatment, frequent consultations, and complications, the evaluation of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) must be improved. This study explored an opportunity for improving patient experience (PE) evaluation of patients with HNC to achieve a patient-centered, integrative evaluation model based on patient needs. The study comprised four phases: (1) a systematic literature review of PE factors for patient quality of life (QoL) and establishment of PE factor categories as a framework, (2) a review of current cancer or HNC PE evaluation tools, (3) identification of potential PE evaluation items based on patient needs by conducting user research, and (4) suggestion of integrative HNC PE evaluation items through expert validation. As a result, the 39 potential items were initially identified from the literature review and user research. After conducting two survey rounds with experts, 25 items were suggested as HNC PE evaluation items. These underscore the importance of highlighting the patient’s participation, the medical staff’s comprehensive information delivery, empathy, and collaborative communication, the hospital’s support of communication channels, the medical environment for patient emotional support, the education program, and systematic patient satisfaction data management. PE evaluation items that consider the diverse perspectives of stakeholders involved in HNC treatment and factors of comprehensive PE will contribute to improving HNC patient-centered care (PCC).
Funder
National Research Foundation of Korea
Reference32 articles.
1. Patient-reported outcomes: Is this the missing link in patient-centered perioperative care?;Wang;Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol.,2021
2. Wong, E., Mavondo, F., and Fisher, J. (2020). Patient feedback to improve quality of patient-centred care in public hospitals: A systematic review of the evidence. BMC Health Serv. Res., 20.
3. The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach and quality of care;Taberna;Front. Oncol.,2020
4. Patient perspectives on care transitions from hospital to home;Jones;JAMA Netw. Open,2022
5. Evaluation of factors associated with unmet needs in adult cancer survivors in Canada;Shakeel;JAMA Netw. Open,2020