Examining Saudi Physicians’ Approaches to Communicate Bad News and Bridging Generational Gaps

Author:

Al Zomia Ahmed Saad1,AlHefdhi Hayfa A.2ORCID,Alqarni Abdulrhman Mohammed3,Aljohani Abdullah K.4,Alshahrani Yazeed Sultan1,Alnahdi Wejdan Abdullah5,Algahtany Aws Mubarak1,Youssef Naglaa6ORCID,Ghazy Ramy Mohamed7ORCID,Alqahtani Ali Abdullah1,Deajim Mosab Abdulaziz1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia

2. Department of Family Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia

3. Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia

4. College of Medicine, Taibah University, Medina 41477, Saudi Arabia

5. Jeddah Eye Hospital, Ministry of Health, Jeddah 11176, Saudi Arabia

6. Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia

7. Tropical Health Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21561, Egypt

Abstract

Breaking bad news is an intrinsic aspect of physicians’ clinical practices. This study aims to investigate how Saudi physicians manage the process of communicating bad news and explore potential differences in breaking bad news practices between young physicians (interns) and their older colleagues. From 1 March to 15 April 2023, ok an anonymous online cross-sectional survey was conducted to explore the communication practices of Saudi physicians concerning breaking bad news using the Communicating Bad News Questionnaire. The physicians were recruited through convenience and snowball sampling methods, and the survey questionnaire was distributed on various social media platforms, including Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and WhatsApp. Data were analyzed using R version 4.2.1. A total of 782 physicians were included in this study. Male physicians represented 50.9% of the participants. Three-quarters (74.7%) were aged 25–30 years. The largest proportion of physicians (45.3%) were interns, followed by junior residents (22.9%), senior residents (11.0%), and specialists (6.5%). The median years of experience was 1.0, ranging from 0 to 45 years. Regarding the place of work, most physicians (86.6%) worked in hospitals, while 13.4% worked in primary healthcare centers. A total of 14.8% said they were not comfortable with discussing patients’/relatives’ issues (20.60 among interns vs. 10.50% among non-interns, χ2 = 27.50, p = 0.0001), 66.6% reported being trained to break bad news (59.60% among interns vs. 72.40% among non-interns, χ2 = 14.34, p = 0.001), 59.1% reported breaking bad news to the patient, 37.9% reported to the family, and 3.1% reported to both, with no significant difference between interns and non-interns. A substantial proportion of physicians reported feeling uncomfortable discussing sensitive issues with patients and their relatives despite having received training to deliver bad news and being willing to communicate bad news directly to patients. Notably, our analysis identified a significant disparity between intern and non-intern physicians, particularly in terms of their comfort level in addressing patient-related concerns and access to breaking bad news training.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference46 articles.

1. Perceptions of health care communication: Examining the role of patients’ psychological distress;Ye;J. Natl. Med. Assoc.,2010

2. Doctor-patient communication: A review;Ha;Ochsner J.,2010

3. Cancer-related information needs and cancer’s impact on control over life influence health-related quality of life among adolescents and young adults with cancer;DeRouen;Psycho-Oncology,2015

4. Health-related information needs in a large and diverse sample of adult cancer survivors: Implications for cancer care;Beckjord;J. Cancer Surviv.,2008

5. Buckman, R. (1984). Breaking bad news: Why is it still so difficult?. Br. Med. J., 288.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3