Affiliation:
1. Department of Drug Technology and Social Pharmacy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Sukileliu Ave. 13, LT-50166 Kaunas, Lithuania
2. Department of Physics, Mathematics and Biophysics, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu Str. 4, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania
Abstract
Background: Despite the fact that for over ten years, Lithuanian consumers have been able to report adverse drug reactions (ADR) directly to the competent authority, reporting rates remain low. A comprehensive understanding of consumer perceptions and experiences regarding ADRs is needed to ascertain further factors impacting their engagement in ADR reporting. This study aimed to assess consumer knowledge of, attitude toward, and practice of reporting ADRs. Methods: A questionnaire-guided cross-sectional survey among 404 consumers between October 2021 and June 2022 was conducted. The semi-structured questionnaire comprised open-ended and closed-ended questions to explore the sociodemographic characteristics and general knowledge of ADRs and pharmacovigilance. Other question items evaluated attitudes toward ADR reporting and ADR reporting practice. The data were summarised using descriptive statistics, while the chi-square test was used to assess categorical variables at p < 0.05. The overall percent score in the knowledge and attitude domains was divided into groups of “poor”, “moderate”, and “good” knowledge, as well as “positive” and “negative” attitudes. Results: While having a generally poor understanding, this study demonstrates that Lithuanian consumers have a favourable attitude toward pharmacovigilance, particularly regarding issues involving the requirement for reporting. The data also revealed the justifications for reporting and not reporting ADRs. Conclusions: The current study provided the first understanding of consumer awareness and ADR reporting intentions, which can help to develop educational campaigns and interventions addressing pharmacovigilance and ADR reporting.
Subject
Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management
Reference51 articles.
1. Methods and Issues to Consider for Detection of Safety Signals From Spontaneous Reporting Databases;Gould;Ther. Innov. Regul. Sci.,2015
2. Completeness of Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Sent by General Practitioners to a Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre: A Descriptive Study;Durrieu;Drug Saf.,2016
3. Quality check of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting forms of different countries;Bandekar;Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf.,2010
4. European Medicines Agency (2023, February 27). Guideline on Good Pharmacovigilance Practices (GVP) Module V—Risk Management Systems (Rev 2) Date for Coming into Effect of First Version 2 July 2012 Date for Coming into Effect of Revision 1 Date for Coming into Effect of Revision 2. Available online: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/06/WC500129134.pdf.
5. Consumer adverse drug reaction reporting: A new step in pharmacovigilance?;Drug Saf.,2003
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献