Patient Information and Consent for Care in the Intensive Care Unit

Author:

Rigaud Jean-Philippe12,Ecarnot Fiona34ORCID,Quenot Jean-Pierre567ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Intensive Care, Centre Hospitalier, 76202 Dieppe, France

2. Espace de Réflexion Éthique de Normandie, University Hospital Caen, 14000 Caen, France

3. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France

4. EA3920, University of Franche-Comté, 25000 Besançon, France

5. Department of Intensive Care, Burgundy University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France

6. Lipness Team, INSERM Research Center LNC-UMR1231 and LabEx LipSTIC, University of Burgundy, 21078 Dijon, France

7. INSERM CIC 1432, Clinical Epidemiology, University of Burgundy, 21078 Dijon, France

Abstract

In this paper, we review the ethical issues involved in providing information to, and obtaining consent (for treatment and/or research) from patients in the intensive care unit. We first review the ethical obligations of the physician in treating patients, who are by definition, vulnerable, and often unable to assert their autonomy during situations of critical illness. Providing clear and transparent information to the patient about treatment options or research opportunities is an ethical and, in some cases, legal obligation for the physicians, but may be rendered difficult, not to say impossible in the intensive care unit by the patient’s health state. In this context, we review the specificities of intensive care with respect to information and consent. We discuss who the right contact person is in the ICU setting, with possible choices including a surrogate decision maker, or a member of the family, in the absence of an officially designated surrogate. We further review the specific considerations relating to the family of critically ill patients, and the amount and type of information that may be given to them without breaching the tenets of medical confidentiality. Finally, we discuss the specific cases of consent to research, and patients who refuse care.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference40 articles.

1. Beauchamp, T.L., and Childress, J.F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford University Press.

2. Gold, F., Choutet, P., and Burfin, E. (1998). Reperes et Situations Éthiques en Médecine, Ellipses.

3. Ethical principles in critical care;Luce;JAMA,1990

4. Moutel, G. (2004). Le Consentement dans les Pratiques de Soins et de Recherche: Entre Idéalismes et Réalités Cliniques, L’Harmattan.

5. (2014, April 28). Law 2002-303 Dated 4 March 2002 Regarding Patients’ Rights and Quality of Healthcare. Available online: http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000227015.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Future for cardiogenic shock research;Current Opinion in Critical Care;2024-05-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3