Affiliation:
1. Department of Nursing Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
2. Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to verify the validity and reliability of the LCSHBS-K. This was a methodological study. The participants were adults aged between 50 and 74 years old, according to the selection criteria for lung cancer screening presented by the Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines in oncology recommendations. This study included 204 high-risk individuals who had not been diagnosed with lung cancer. The collected data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics software 26.0 version (IBM, New York, NY, USA). The reliability was analyzed by Cronbach’s α for internal consistency, and the concurrent validity was analyzed by Pearson’s correlation coefficients to identify the correlations with the health belief scale for Korean adults. To test the convergent validity, the average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) were calculated using confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, the model fit for a tool was CMIN (χ2/df), SRMR, RMSEA, GFI, and CFI as a comparative fit index. The discriminant validity was tested based on AVE > r2. The average age of the participants was 55.49 (SD = 5.07), the average smoking history was 29.55 (SD = 8.12) years, and the average number of cigarettes smoked per day was 12.18 (SD = 7.77). The goodness of fit met the criteria with GFI = 0.81 (criteria > 0.9), CMIN = 1.69 (criteria < 2), SRMR = 0.06 (criteria < 0.08), RMSEA = 0.058 (criteria < 0.06), and CFI = 0.91 (criteria > 0.9). The LCSHBS-K showed a statistically significant positive correlation with the HBS (r = 0.32 (p < 0.001)). Cronbach’s α was 0.80 for all the items in the LCSHBS-K. Therefore, the validity and reliability of the LCSHBS-K tool were confirmed. Based on the results of this study, the Korean version of the LCSHBS tool was found to be suitable for screening lung cancer in high-risk groups in Korea.
Subject
Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management
Reference31 articles.
1. Lung cancer screening: What do long-term smokers know and believe?;Ceppa;Health Expect.,2017
2. Korean Statistical Information Service (2023, March 14). Statistical Results of Causes of Death in 2021, Available online: https://kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10301010000&&bid=218&act=view&list_no=420715.
3. Korean Statistical Information Service (2023, March 10). 5-Year Relative Survival Rate for 24 Cancer Types/Time of Cancer Occurrence/Gender in 2020. Available online: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=117&tblId=DT_117N_A00021&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=F_35&scrId=&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLE&path=%252FstatisticsList%252FstatisticsListIndex.do.
4. Barriers to lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography;Lei;Oncol. Nurs. Forum,2019
5. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team (2011). Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N. Engl. J. Med., 365, 395–409.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献