EASY-NET Program: Effectiveness of an Audit and Feedback Intervention in the Emergency Care for Acute Conditions in the Lazio Region

Author:

Angelici Laura1ORCID,Angioletti Carmen2ORCID,Pinnarelli Luigi1,Colais Paola1,de Belvis Antonio Giulio3,Melnyk Andriy4,La Gatta Emanuele4,Farchi Sara5,Davoli Marina1ORCID,Agabiti Nera1,Acampora Anna1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service–Lazio, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00147 Rome, Italy

2. Management and Health Laboratory, Institute of Management, Department Embeds, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy

3. Critical Pathways and Evaluation Outcome Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli”—IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy

4. Faculty of Economics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy

5. Area Rete Ospedaliera E Specialistica, Direzione Regionale Salute E Integrazione Sociosanitaria Regione Lazio, 00168 Rome, Italy

Abstract

The EASY-NET network program (NET-2016-02364191)—effectiveness of audit and feedback (A&F) strategies to improve health practice and equity in various clinical and organizational settings), piloted a novel and more structured A&F strategy. This study compared the effectiveness of the novel strategy against the sole periodic dissemination of indicators in enhancing the appropriateness and timeliness of emergency health interventions for patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and ischemic stroke in the Lazio Region. The efficacy of the intervention was assessed through a prospective quasi-experimental design employing a pre- and post-intervention (2021–2022) comparison with a control group. Participating hospitals in the Lazio Region, where professional teams voluntarily engaged in the intervention, constituted the exposed group, while the control group exclusively engaged in routine reporting activities. Effectiveness analysis was conducted at the patient level, utilizing regional health information systems to compute process and outcome indicators. The effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated using difference-in-difference models, comparing pre- and post-intervention periods between exposed and control groups. Estimates were calculated in terms of the difference in percentage points (PP) between absolute risks. Sixteen facilities for the AMI pathway and thirteen for the stroke pathway participated in the intervention. The intervention yielded a reduction in the proportion of 30-day readmissions following hospitalization for ischemic stroke by 0.54 pp in the exposed patients demonstrating a significant difference of −3.80 pp (95% CI: −6.57; −1.03; 5453 patients, 63.7% cases) in the exposed group compared to controls. However, no statistically significant differences attributable to the implemented A&F intervention were observed in other indicators considered. These results represent the first evidence in Italy of the impact of A&F interventions in an emergency setting, utilizing aggregated data from hospitals involved in the Lazio Region’s emergency network.

Funder

Italian Ministry of Health and Lazio Region

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference32 articles.

1. (2022, September 10). Programma Nazionale Esiti—Edition 2021, Available online: https://www.agenas.gov.it/comunicazione/primo-piano/2005-pne-2021-agenas-presenta-i-risultati-al-ministero-della-salute.

2. P.Re.Val.E (2023, September 15). (Programma Regionale Valutazione Esiti”—Regional Program for Outcomes and Processes Evaluation) Edition 2022 Web Sites. Available online: https://www.dep.lazio.it/prevale2022/.

3. Audit and feedback: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes;Ivers;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2012

4. Unpacking the intention to action gap: A qualitative study understanding how physicians engage with audit and feedback;Desveaux;Implement. Sci.,2021

5. Economic evaluations of audit and feedback interventions: A systematic review;Moore;BMJ Qual. Saf.,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3