Quality Indicators during Delivery and the Immediate Postpartum Period: A Modified Delphi Study

Author:

Guiguet-Auclair Candy12ORCID,Rivière Olivier3,Gerbaud Laurent12,Vendittelli Françoise14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France

2. Service de Santé Publique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France

3. Audipog, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1-Laennec, 7 Rue Guillaume Paradin, CEDEX 08, F-69372 Lyon, France

4. Réseau de Santé Périnatale d’Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France

Abstract

Background: Our research hypothesis was that most French indicators of quality of care have been validated by experts who are not clinicians and might not always be meaningful for clinicians. Our objective was to define a core set of measurable indicators of care quality during delivery and the immediate postpartum period relevant to clinical practice. Methods: A steering committee comprising nine specialists in obstetrics and/or public health conducted a literature review to develop potential indicators. A panel of obstetrician-gynecologists and midwives working in a delivery unit rated each indicator for appropriateness in a two-round Rand-modified Delphi procedure and a physical meeting. The consensus among the panelists was assessed. Results: In the first round, 145 panelists (110 obstetrician-gynecologists and 35 midwives) assessed 77 indicators and 3 definitions: 6 related to labor onset, 20 to delivery, 3 to pain management, 23 to neonatal morbidity/mortality, and 28 to maternal morbidity. In the second round, 132 panelists (98 obstetrician-gynecologists and 34 midwives) assessed 42 indicators and 1 definition. The final set comprised 50 indicators and 2 definitions. Conclusions: This Delphi procedure selected 50 indicators that reflect the quality of perinatal care. These indicators should be recorded in each French maternity ward’s birth register for each delivery.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference51 articles.

1. (2023, February 09). World Health Organization—Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/millennium-development-goals-(mdgs).

2. Development and assessment of indicators for quality of care in severe preeclampsia/eclampsia and postpartum hemorrhage;Talungchit;J. Healthc. Qual.,2013

3. Selection of indicators for continuous monitoring of patient safety: Recommendations of the project ’safety improvement for patients in Europe’;Kristensen;Int. J. Qual. Health Care,2009

4. Development of quality of care indicators from systematic reviews: The case of hospital delivery;Bonfill;Implement. Sci.,2013

5. Measuring and improving quality in obstetrics—The implementation of national indicators in Denmark;Kesmodel;Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3