Sex Differences in Mental Status and Coping Strategies among Adult Mexican Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
-
Published:2023-02-09
Issue:4
Volume:11
Page:514
-
ISSN:2227-9032
-
Container-title:Healthcare
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Healthcare
Author:
Brambila-Tapia Aniel Jessica Leticia1ORCID, Macías-Espinoza Fabiola2, González-Cantero Joel Omar3ORCID, Martínez-Arriaga Reyna Jazmín4ORCID, Reyes-Domínguez Yesica Arlae5, Ramírez-García María Luisa5
Affiliation:
1. Departamento de Psicología Básica, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico 2. Departamento de Psicología Aplicada, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico 3. Departamento de Ciencias del Comportamiento, Centro Universitario de los Valles (CUVALLES), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 46600, Jalisco, Mexico 4. Clínicas de Salud Mental, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico 5. Maestría en Psicología de la Salud, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico
Abstract
We performed a cross-sectional study in order to determine the association between stress coping strategies and stress, depression, and anxiety, in which the Mexican population was invited to answer these variables by an electronic questionnaire. A total of 1283 people were included, of which 64.8% were women. Women presented higher levels of stress, depression, and anxiety than men; likewise, women showed a higher frequency of some maladaptive coping strategies (behavioral disengagement and denial) and lower levels of some adaptive ones (active coping and planning); additionally, maladaptive coping strategies were positively correlated with stress and depression in both sexes: self-blame, behavioral disengagement, denial, substance use, and self-distraction. Likewise, there were negative correlations between stress and depression and the adaptive strategies: planning, active coping, acceptance, and positive reframing. For women, religion presented negative correlations with stress, depression, and anxiety, and humor showed low positive correlations with stress, anxiety, and depression. In conclusion, most adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies are common in both sexes with the exception of religion, which seems to be adaptive in women and neutral in men, and humor, which seems to be adaptive in men and maladaptive in women. In addition, emotional and instrumental support seem to be neutral in both sexes.
Subject
Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management
Reference29 articles.
1. McHugh, S., and Vallis, T.M. (1986). Illness Behavior. A Multidisciplinary Model, Plenum Press. 2. Lazarus, R.S., and Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping, Springer. 3. Brambila-Tapia, A.J.L., Macías-Espinoza, F., Reyes-Domínguez, Y.A., Ramírez-García, M.L., Miranda-Lavastida, A.J., Ríos-González, B.E., Saldaña-Cruz, A.M., Esparza-Guerrero, Y., Mora-Moreno, F.F., and Dávalos-Rodríguez, I.P. (2022). Association of Depression, Anxiety, Stress and Stress-Coping Strategies with Somatization and Number of Diseases According to Sex in the Mexican General Population. Healthcare, 10. 4. Association between personal, medical and positive psychological variables with somatization in university health sciences students;Psychol. Health Med.,2019 5. Sleep and somatic complaints in university students;Schlarb;J. Pain Res.,2017
|
|