Development and Validation of the Attitudes towards Social Robots Scale

Author:

Niewrzol Daniel B.1,Ostermann Thomas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, 58452 Witten, Germany

Abstract

The idea of artificially created social robots has a long tradition. Today, attitudes towards robots play a central role in the field of healthcare. Our research aimed to develop a scale to measure attitudes towards robots. The survey consisted of nine questions on attitudes towards robots, sociodemographic questions, the SWOP-K9, measuring self-efficacy, optimism, and pessimism, and the BFI-10, measuring personality dimensions. Structural relations between the items were detected using principal components analysis (PCA) with Varimax rotation. Correlations and Analysis of Variance were used for external validation. In total, 214 participants (56.1% female, mean age: 30.8 ± 14.4 years) completed the survey. The PCA found two main components, “Robot as a helper and assistant” (RoHeA) and “Robot as an equal partner” (RoEqP), with four items each explaining 53.2% and 17.5% of the variance with a Cronbach’s α of 0.915 and 0.768. In the personality traits, “Conscientiousness” correlated weakly with both subscales and “Extraversion” correlated with RoHeA, while none the subscales of the SWOP-K9 significantly correlated with RoEqP or RoHeA. Male participants scored significantly higher than female participants. Our survey yielded a stable and convergent two-factor instrument that exhibited convincing validity and complements other findings in the field. The ASRS can easily be used to describe attitudes towards social robots in human society. Further research, however, should be carried out to investigate the discriminant and convergent validity of the ASRS.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference82 articles.

1. Evolution of robots throughout history from Hephaestus to Da Vinci Robot;Iavazzo;Acta Med. -Hist. Adriat.,2014

2. Capek, K. (2004). RUR (Rossum’s Universal Robots), Penguin.

3. A history of robots: From science fiction to surgical robotics;Hockstein;J. Robot. Surg.,2007

4. Yanco, H.A., and Drury, J. (2004, January 10–13). Classifying human-robot interaction: An updated taxonomy. Proceedings of the Systems, Man and Cybernetics IEEE International Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands.

5. Cote Dumphy, B.M., Lee, J., Cassidy, R.P., and Mitchell-Evans, W.O. (2023, June 28). Why Do Humans Imagine Robots?. Available online: https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/iqp-all/2469.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3