Causes for Medical Errors in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Author:

Klemann Désirée12,Rijkx Maud3,Mertens Helen4,van Merode Frits25ORCID,Klein Dorthe26ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands

2. Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands

3. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht University, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands

4. Executive Board, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht University, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands

5. Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht University, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands

6. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6228 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background: Quality strategies, interventions, and frameworks have been developed to facilitate a better understanding of healthcare systems. Reporting adverse events is one of these strategies. Gynaecology and obstetrics are one of the specialties with many adverse events. To understand the main causes of medical errors in gynaecology and obstetrics and how they could be prevented, we conducted this systematic review. Methods: This systematic review was performed in compliance with the Prisma 2020 guidelines. We searched several databases for relevant studies (Jan 2010–May 2023). Studies were included if they indicated the presence of any potential risk factor at the hospital level for medical errors or adverse events in gynaecology or obstetrics. Results: We included 26 articles in the quantitative analysis of this review. Most of these (n = 12) are cross-sectional studies; eight are case–control studies, and six are cohort studies. One of the most frequently reported contributing factors is delay in healthcare. In addition, the availability of products and trained staff, team training, and communication are often reported to contribute to near-misses/maternal deaths. Conclusions: All risk factors that were found in our review imply several categories of contributing factors regarding: (1) delay of care, (2) coordination and management of care, and (3) scarcity of supply, personnel, and knowledge.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference40 articles.

1. Busse, R.P.D., and Quentin, W. (2019). Improving Healthcare Quality in Europe: Characteristics, Effectiveness and Implementation of Different Strategies, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.

2. Graafmans, W. (2010). EU Actions on Patient Safety and Quality of Healthcare, European Commission, Healthcare Systems Unit.

3. World Health Organization, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development & International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2018). Delivering Quality Health Services: A Global Imperative for Universal Health Coverage, World Health Organization, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development & International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. World Health.

4. OECD (2017). Caring for Quality in Health: Lessons Learnt from 15 Reviews of Health Care Quality, OECD Publishing.

5. Adverse events in health care: Issues in measurement;Walshe;Health Care Qual.,2000

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3