Addressing Health Disparities through Community Participation: A Scoping Review of Co-Creation in Public Health

Author:

Morales-Garzón Sergio1ORCID,Parker Lucy Anne12ORCID,Hernández-Aguado Ildefonso12ORCID,González-Moro Tolosana Manuel1,Pastor-Valero María123ORCID,Chilet-Rosell Elisa12

Affiliation:

1. Public Health, History of Science and Gynaecology Department, Miguel Hernández University, 03550 Alicante, Spain

2. CIBER in Epidemiology and Public Health, 28029 Madrid, Spain

3. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-220, Brazil

Abstract

Background: There is general agreement regarding the relevance of community involvement in public health policy, practice, and research to reduce health inequities. Objective: This review aims to analyse the experiences of community engagement in public health actions, with particular attention to methodologies used and how community participation is articulated. Method and Analysis: We searched the Web of Science, EBSCO, and ProQuest for scientific articles published in peer-reviewed journals. We recorded methodological aspects, the approach to equity, actors that participated in the actions, and participation of the community in different phases (agenda setting, design, implementation, and evaluation). Results: Of 4331 records, we finally included 31 studies published between 1995 and 2021. Twelve studies referred to Community-Based Participatory Research as the framework used. The actions addressed equity, mainly by tackling economic vulnerability (n = 20, 64%) and racial discrimination (n = 18, 58%). Workshops were the most used method. Participation was frequently observed in the design and implementation phases of the action, but it was reduced to community feedback in the evaluation. Conclusions: Co-created public health actions offer the opportunity to reduce health inequity and promote social change; yet, further effort is needed to involve communities in the entire cycle of decision making.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference66 articles.

1. World Health Organization (2020). Community Engagement: A Health Promotion Guide for Universal Health Coverage in the Hands of the People, World Health Organization.

2. World Health Organization (2017). Community Engagement Framework for Quality, People-Centred and Resilient Health Services, World Health Organization.

3. McCloskey, D.J., Akintobi, T.H., Bonham, A., Cook, J., and Coyne-Beasley, T. (2011). Principles of Community Engagement.

4. Centers for Disease (2023, January 25). CDC—10 Essential Public Health Services—CSTLTS, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/publichealthgateway/publichealthservices/essentialhealthservices.html.

5. World Health Organization (1986). Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, World Health Organization.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3